2017
DOI: 10.5487/tr.2017.33.2.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Test Method for the Evaluation of DNA Damage in Mouse Spermatogonial Stem Cells

Abstract: Although alternative test methods based on the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) are being developed to replace animal testing in reproductive and developmental toxicology, they are still in an early stage. Consequently, we aimed to develop alternative test methods in male animals using mouse spermatogonial stem cells (mSSCs). Here, we modified the OECD TG 489 and optimized the in vitro comet assay in our previous study. This study aimed to verify the validity of in vitro tests involving mSSCs by compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After electrophoresis, the slides were rinsed three times with a neutralizing buffer (0.4 M Tris, pH 7.5) for at least 5 min each, dehydrated in absolute ethanol at 4°C, and allowed to dry. The cells were stained with 20 μg/ml of propidium iodide (PI, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.) 34. Images were then captured using a fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at ×200 magnification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After electrophoresis, the slides were rinsed three times with a neutralizing buffer (0.4 M Tris, pH 7.5) for at least 5 min each, dehydrated in absolute ethanol at 4°C, and allowed to dry. The cells were stained with 20 μg/ml of propidium iodide (PI, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.) 34. Images were then captured using a fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at ×200 magnification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were seeded onto chamber slides at a density of 1.0×10 5 cells/well and after 20 h, they were treated with shikonin (3 µM) for 48 h. Then, the chamber slides were fixed, and the cells were permeabilized. After washing in PBS, the stained cells were visualized with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX 70, Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) and quantified (Jeon et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cell viability study, 5 × 10 3 HINAE cells were seeded per well in 96-well plates, incubated for 24 h, and then incubated with different concentrations of tacrolimus or nargenicin A1 for 24 h or pre-incubated with nargenicin A1 for 1 h before being treated with tacrolimus for 24 h. Cells were also treated with N -acetyl cysteine (NAC, Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.), a known ROS scavenger, for 1 h in the presence or absence of tacrolimus. Subsequently, cell viability was determined using an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.) assay as previously described [28]. The experiments were repeated three times with at least triplicate wells for each concentration, and results are expressed as percentage reductions in absorbance versus non-treated controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%