2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a template to facilitate reflection among student pharmacists

Abstract: This novel and innovative approach supports novice reflectors, encourages reflection on action and enhances professional development. It is a structured yet flexible tool, for which there was a gap in the published literature. It can be utilized in varied placements in pharmacy curricula internationally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of reflection is not innate (Driessen, Tartwijk & Dornan 2008); it requires facilitation (Deslandes et al 2018;Ip et al 2012;Plack et al 2008). Reflection provides tertiary healthcare students with a means of furthering their skills and knowledge development within the context of lifelong learning (Donovan 2007;Mamede & Schmidt 2004;Paget 2001;Roche & Coote 2008;Stark et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The development of reflection is not innate (Driessen, Tartwijk & Dornan 2008); it requires facilitation (Deslandes et al 2018;Ip et al 2012;Plack et al 2008). Reflection provides tertiary healthcare students with a means of furthering their skills and knowledge development within the context of lifelong learning (Donovan 2007;Mamede & Schmidt 2004;Paget 2001;Roche & Coote 2008;Stark et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have focused on the development of students' reflection in one placement or with different student cohorts. Recent research in physiotherapy (e.g., Greenfield et al 2017) and pharmacy (e.g., Deslandes et al 2018) has provided evidence of student reflection outcomes across longer durations. For example, Greenfield et al (2017) compared an historical databank of student reflective narratives written without the support of a framework or specific teaching strategy to those generated from a pilot study that used the Gibbs model of reflection to support reflection narratives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Please tell us about something that happened in your placements that made you reflect on your role as a pharmacist in patient care and/or the role of other health and social care professionals?" The template had previously been developed by the authors after multiple cycles of action research involving placement supervisor and student input [24]. All student reflective accounts were assessed against a reflective rubric [25,26], developed by integrating Mezirow's [27] and Gibbs' models of reflection, and related to different stages of reflection [24] Replicating a validated approach, four human experts assessed the same set of reflective accounts [25,26].…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The template had previously been developed by the authors after multiple cycles of action research involving placement supervisor and student input [24]. All student reflective accounts were assessed against a reflective rubric [25,26], developed by integrating Mezirow's [27] and Gibbs' models of reflection, and related to different stages of reflection [24] Replicating a validated approach, four human experts assessed the same set of reflective accounts [25,26]. Reflective accounts were assigned a score for each of these stages of reflection: a score of 0 was assigned where the student had not demonstrated any reflective skills in the writing (non-reflective), a score of 0.5 when an attempt was made to relate experiences or feelings with prior knowledge and identify learning (reflective), and a score of 1 when clear links were made between experiences, feelings, learning and a change of behaviour was demonstrated (critically reflective).…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%