2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a T cell-based immunodiagnostic system to effectively distinguish SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination status

Abstract: Both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccines elicit memory T cell responses. Here, we report the development of two pools of experimentally-defined SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes, that in combination with spike, were used to discriminate four groups of subjects with different SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine status. The overall T cell-based classification accuracy was 89.2% and 88.5% in the experimental and validation cohorts. This scheme was applicable to different mRNA vaccines, different lengths of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results demonstrate an anamnestic humoral and cellular vaccine-elicited immunity in Omicron BTI including a CD8 T cell profile that resembled the more potent T cell activation found in infected, unvaccinated individuals 28 , 48 . This CD8 T cell profile contrasted with a terminal effector profile (phenotype and cytotoxic functions similar to vaccine boost responses 49 , 50 ) found in Delta breakthrough infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current results demonstrate an anamnestic humoral and cellular vaccine-elicited immunity in Omicron BTI including a CD8 T cell profile that resembled the more potent T cell activation found in infected, unvaccinated individuals 28 , 48 . This CD8 T cell profile contrasted with a terminal effector profile (phenotype and cytotoxic functions similar to vaccine boost responses 49 , 50 ) found in Delta breakthrough infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…1f ). Emergence of specific responses to Spike and non-Spike was visualized in a biplot of Spike vs. non-Spike response as recently described 28 . Here responses can be divided into quadrants: infected and nonvaccinated (I + V − ), non-infected and vaccinated (I − V + ); or infected and vaccinated (I + V + ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of PBMC available for analysis was limited, but 26 subjects had a sufficient number of cells available to perform additional analyses related to this issue. To examine T cell responses to the rest of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome, we utilized the approach recently described by Yu et al, based on CD4-RE, a pool of experimentally defined 15-mer epitopes derived from the whole SARS-CoV-2 proteome (excluding S) [21]. The CD4-RE epitope pool was tested in parallel with the S pool in the subset of 26 acute COVID-19 donors for which sufficient cells were available.…”
Section: Cd4 T Cell Reactivity To Spike and Non-spike Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD4+ T cell responses to the four prototypical CCC viruses (NL63, 229E, HKU1 and OC43) were measured, using the Activation Induced Marker (AIM) and the OX40/4-1BB markers combination 26 , which has been previously utilized to characterize viral responses and particularly SARS-CoV-2 CD4+ T cell responses [36][37][38][39][40] . Responses to other respiratory viruses (influenza, RSV, and rhinovirus), chronically infectious viruses (EBV, CMV, and VZV), and ubiquitous bacterial vaccine antigens (TT and PT) were measured using specific peptide sets (Table 2 and methods section).…”
Section: Frequency Of Ccc-specific Memory Cd4 + T Cells Are Comparabl...mentioning
confidence: 99%