2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Synthetic Population Model for Assessing Excess Risk for Cardiovascular Disease Death

Abstract: This decision analytical model describes the use of a semisynthetic population to identify the distribution of excess cardiovascular death risk and its correlation with social and biological risk factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The synthetic population approaches have shown to be effective in epidemic simulation applications and in deriving synthetic population from the country-wide census for privacy protection of the individuals (Wickramasinghe et al, 2020). This approach also has vast policy implications, because by using synthetic populations, policymakers can evaluate the city-scale built environment policies (He et al, 2020), analyze the risk for cardiovascular disease (Krauland et al, 2020), and evaluate electricity consumption in a neighborhood (van Dam et al, 2017).…”
Section: Johnsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthetic population approaches have shown to be effective in epidemic simulation applications and in deriving synthetic population from the country-wide census for privacy protection of the individuals (Wickramasinghe et al, 2020). This approach also has vast policy implications, because by using synthetic populations, policymakers can evaluate the city-scale built environment policies (He et al, 2020), analyze the risk for cardiovascular disease (Krauland et al, 2020), and evaluate electricity consumption in a neighborhood (van Dam et al, 2017).…”
Section: Johnsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 highlights the confusion matrix results for the three methods that were evaluated as a part of this analysis. 1 This result is different from the 2018 FYSAS statewide value (0.137) because the dataset was split in half for the purposes of model building. The models are compared with the result from the half of the dataset that they were tested on.…”
Section: Estimating Electronic Vaping Usage and Relevant Predictors Among Youth In Floridamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Examples include predicting the effect of new cancer screening on the US population, identifying obesity hotspots (i.e., geographic areas with unusually high prevalence of high BMI individuals), and predicting the effect of interventions aimed to reduce opioid-related deaths. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In each case, predictive models need to use data on population demographics and geographic locations, along with the natural history of the disease, administrative data, etc. We can thus formulate the main question as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Importantly, risk evaluations of synthetic data use reveal that no direct connections between a generated data point and the real person are possible and that synthetic data (SD) are regarded as low-risk in practice. 27,28 Some study results show that synthetic data have high validity and can be used as a proxy in clinical trials, 29 in neuroimaging studies, 30 or RWD 27,[31][32][33][34][35] and do not lead to an increased bias, however, systematic and scoping reviews are still lacking. Utility metrics serve as a way to assess the consistency between RWD and synthetic data, as well as validate and measure utility.…”
Section: Privacy and Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%