2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2020-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a SNP-based assay for measuring genetic diversity in the Tasmanian devil insurance population

Abstract: BackgroundThe Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) has undergone a recent, drastic population decline due to the highly contagious devil facial tumor disease. The tumor is one of only two naturally occurring transmissible cancers and is almost inevitably fatal. In 2006 a disease-free insurance population was established to ensure that the Tasmanian devil is protected from extinction. The insurance program is dependent upon preserving as much wild genetic diversity as possible to maximize the success of subse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the novel sets of SNPs outperform STRs to assess identity, parentage (Tokarska et al, 2009;Wright et al, 2015), or population structure (Glover et al, 2010;Senn et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the novel sets of SNPs outperform STRs to assess identity, parentage (Tokarska et al, 2009;Wright et al, 2015), or population structure (Glover et al, 2010;Senn et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous characterizations of genetic diversity and population structure in devils have focused on relatively few (<12) microsatellite loci (Jones et al 2004; Brüniche-Olsen et al 2014), MHC loci (Siddle et al 2010), mitochondrial genomes (Miller et al 2011), SNPs (Miller et al 2011; Wright et al 2015; Morris et al 2015), or whole-genome sequencing of two individuals (Miller et al 2011). Here we use Restriction-site-Associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) (Andrews et al 2016) to identify and genotype a large number of polymorphic nuclear loci at 38 localities across the species range to assess genome-wide patterns of genetic diversity and population structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these markers did not provide enough resolution for the determination of parentage in the large free‐range enclosures that house up to 20 individuals. Since 2012, work has commenced to develop new markers (data in development) and a new single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐based assay to assist with determining founder relationships and to allocate parentage in the managed environmental enclosures and free‐ranging enclosures (Morris et al ., ; Wright et al ., ). Preliminary analysis has shown that some founding individuals exhibit higher relationships than others, which will have knock‐on consequences for the pedigree analysis into the future (B. Wright, pers.…”
Section: Migrating To a Metapopulation Management Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown there to be limited genetic diversity in populations across the State (Miller, W., et al ., ), as well as a limited diversity in the immune genes (Morris et al ., ), and that the cancer has the ability to hide from the immune system (Woods et al ., ; Siddle et al ., ). The sequencing of the complete Tasmanian devil genome in 2010 has greatly assisted in the understanding of DFTD as well as with the development of new genetic markers and genomic technologies (Murchison et al ., ; Morris et al ., ; Wright et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%