2012
DOI: 10.7472/jksii.2012.13.5.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Smart Education Model for Field Application of Smart Education

Abstract: To explore the directions of 'Smart Education', we conduct a delphi survey field experts related to it recognized new educational paradigm of 21st century. As a result we can deduct common ground on educational goal, contents, method, evaluation, environment of 'Smart Education'. On the basis of these results, we develop a Smart Education Model to be able to provide a guide in the field. It is a systemic education model consisting of interrelated educational contents, method, evaluation, and environment of 'Sm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently interests in smart learning are increasing. There have been some research works for smart learning [1,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently interests in smart learning are increasing. There have been some research works for smart learning [1,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement the SMART education policy in schools, the Korean government has developed digital textbooks, online learning resources, and infrastructure systems that allow wireless Internet connections in the school. In addition to these hardware and software-based supports, many educators and researchers have developed SMART educational models (e.g., Kim and Bae 2012;Noh et al 2011), and conducted classroom-based research to find out the effectiveness of SMART education (e.g., Kim and Lee 2016;Leem and Kim 2016). In addition, research on teachers' perception of Smart education have been studied with many different groups of teachers including pre-service teachers (Seol and Son 2012), in-service teachers (Lim 2012), leading teachers (Park et al 2013), and science teachers (Yang et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…김미용․배영권 [7] 또한 스마트교육 목표에 대한 방향 을 탐색하기 위해 델파이 조사를 실시한 바 있는데, 21세 기를 살아갈 학습자 역량으로 문제해결력을 가장 중요한 요소로 지목하였으며 최신 테크놀로지의 활용을 강조한 바 있다.…”
unclassified