Development of a simplified Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

Wei, Xianzhao; Wang, Z.; Yang, Chen; Wu, Bing; Liu, X.; Yi, Honglei; Chen, Z.; Wang, F.; Bai, Yushu; Li, J.; Zhu, Xiaodong; Li, M.

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.018

Cited by 32 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nowadays, due to the largest population of patients and government’s greater attention to scientific research in China, a sharp increase in the quantity and quality of clinical research has been witnessed over years, and the second large number of papers is publishing annually [22]. Therefore, valid questionnaires are urgently needed to support this huge amount of clinical research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To assess content validity of SC-FJS, we invited one rehabilitation expert and three orthopedic experts to analyze the correlation between content in each item and state of disease. Good construct validity meant that the questionnaire correlated well with measures of the same construct (convergent validity) while correlating poorly with measures of different constructs (divergent or discriminant validity) [22]. Based on this theory, we assumed that the score of SC-FJS should be in accordance with subdomains of KOOS and physical subdomains (physical function, role-physical, and bodily pain) of SF-36, but not with mental subdomains (role-emotional and mental health) of SF-36.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Under this assumption, we calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient ( r ) between SC-FJS and domains of KOOS and SF-36. Then, the construct validity for SC-FJS was evaluated by comparing how data fitted with the calculated correlations, judged as poor ( r = 0–0.2), fair ( r = 0.2–0.4), moderate ( r = 0.4–0.6), very good ( r = 0.6–0.8), or excellent ( r = 0.8–1.0) [22]. …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a newly developed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire designed to evaluate the awareness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study cross-culturally adapted and psychometrically validated a simplified Chinese version of the FJS (SC-FJS).MethodsCross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the internationally recognized guidelines. One-hundred and fifty participants who underwent primary TKA were recruited in this study. Cronbach’s α and intra-class correlations were used to determine reliability. Construct validity was analyzed by evaluating the correlations between SC-FJS and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the short form (36) health survey (SF-36).ResultsEach of the 12 items was properly responded and correlated with the total items. SC-FJS had excellent reliability [Cronbach’s α = 0.907, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.970, 95% CI 0.959–0.978). Elimination of any one item in all did not result in a value of Cronbach’s α of <0.80. SC-FJS had a high correlation with symptoms (0.67, p < 0.001) and pain (0.60, p < 0.001) domains of KOOS and social functioning (0.66, p < 0.001) domain of SF-36, and it also moderately correlated with function in daily living (0.53, p < 0.001) and function in sport and recreation (0.40, p < 0.001) domains of KOOS, and physical subscale of SF-36 (0.49–0.53, p < 0.001) but had a low (r = 0.20) or not significant (p > 0.05) correlation with mental subscale of SF-36.ConclusionsSC-FJS demonstrated excellent acceptability, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity, which can be recommended for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty in Mainland China.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13018-016-0508-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In China, clinical surgeons are paying more attention to self-reported outcome assessment. Several hip-specific instruments have been translated and crossculturally adapted into Chinese, including the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [26]. At present, there is no agreement for which questionnaire should be used to evaluate the status of patients with hip OA.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Valid Simplified Chinese Version of the Oxford Hip Score in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

Zheng

Zhao

et al. 2014

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clinical research is now developing rapidly in China, with a large number of relevant articles published every year. This can be explained by both the largest number of patient populations in China and the attention of the government to the scientific research [44]. Currently, effective scale instruments are needed in China to support the enormous clinical studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural translation of the Western Ontario Cuff Index in Chinese and its validation in patients with rotator cuff disorders

Wang

Xie

Jia

et al. 2017

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a scale designed to evaluate the impact of rotator cuff (RC) disorders on patients’ general quality of life. Our study aims to adapt the WORC for Chinese patients and to assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in Chinese patients with RC disorders.MethodsFirst, we developed the Chinese version of the WORC (C-WORC) in a five-step procedure of translation and cross-cultural adaptation. Next, the recruiting patients finished all three rounds of scales of the C-WORC, the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and the Oxford Shoulder score (OSS). Then we calculated Cronbach’s alpha, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r or r s), the effect size (ES), and the standardized response mean (SRM) to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the C-WORC, respectively.ResultsOverall, 124 patients with RC disorders successfully completed the first two rounds of the scales, and 108 patients completed the last round of the scales. Good or excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.872–0.954) was found in the overall scale and subscales of C-WORC, as well as good or excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.828–0.961). Moderate or good correlations (r/r s = 0.472–0.787) were obtained between the physical subscales of the C-WORC and the OSS and the physical subscales of SF-36; the results were also obtained for the emotions subscale of the C-WORC and the mental subscales of SF-36 (r/r s = 0.520–0.713), which, adequately illustrated that good validity was included in the C-WORC. In addition, good responsiveness was also observed in the overall scale and subscales of the C-WORC (ES = 1.57–2.27, SRM = 1.52–2.28).ConclusionsThe C-WORC scale is reliable, valid and responsible for the evaluation of Chinese-speaking patients with RC disorders and would be an effective instrument.

show abstract

Development of a simplified Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

Cited by 32 publications

References 17 publications

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Development of a Valid Simplified Chinese Version of the Oxford Hip Score in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis

Cross-cultural translation of the Western Ontario Cuff Index in Chinese and its validation in patients with rotator cuff disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About