2012
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2012.15659abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Short-Form Learning Organization Survey: The LOS-27

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of instruments have been designed to measure organisational learning (or factors closely related to organisational learning) (Correia‐Lima et al, ). In particular, the Learning Organisation Survey‐27 (LOS‐27) (Singer, Moore, Meterko, & Williams, ) and the Dimensions of a Learning Organisation Questionnaire (DLOQ) (Watkins & O'Neil, ; Yang, Watkins, & Marsick, ) are two examples of well‐developed instruments available to measure factors associated with organisational learning. Importantly, the LOS‐27 has been tested in the health care setting (Singer et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of instruments have been designed to measure organisational learning (or factors closely related to organisational learning) (Correia‐Lima et al, ). In particular, the Learning Organisation Survey‐27 (LOS‐27) (Singer, Moore, Meterko, & Williams, ) and the Dimensions of a Learning Organisation Questionnaire (DLOQ) (Watkins & O'Neil, ; Yang, Watkins, & Marsick, ) are two examples of well‐developed instruments available to measure factors associated with organisational learning. Importantly, the LOS‐27 has been tested in the health care setting (Singer et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higgins et al (), however, used three of the five Psychological Safety subscale items among a sample of teachers and found a Cronbach's alpha of .83. In addition, Singer et al () developed a shortened version of the LOS composed of only 27 items using an exploratory factor analysis and a multitrait analysis, which confirmed the eight‐factor structure of the original 55‐item measure. All of the Psychological Safety and Appreciation of Differences subscale items loaded on one of two factors: Safe Environment or Unsafe Environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The statements of each subscale are rated on a 7‐point Likert‐type scale ranging from 1 ( highly inaccurate ) to 7 ( highly accurate ), with higher scores representing perceptions of a safer environment (Psychological Safety) and greater appreciation of differences (Appreciation of Differences). In line with previous researchers (Higgins, Ishimaru, Holcombe, & Fowler, ; Singer, Moore, Meterko, & Williams, ), we adapted the language of the items to reflect the counseling program as the environment under evaluation (by replacing the word unit with program ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations