2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03324-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a sensitive direct injection LC-MS/MS method for the detection of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in hard waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these can still suffer limited selectivity for application to large numbers of chemically diverse CECs as well as the potential for analyte and matrix carryover if the methods are not properly optimised, especially in complex samples. While direct-injection MS methods are still not widely considered for the quantitation of large numbers of CECs due to the potential for significant matrix effects, recently, direct-injection LC-MS of CECs in water has emerged, usually with gradient pre-separation to minimise these effects [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In many cases, this requires the large volume injection (LVI) of sample (typically between 80-5000 µL) and can help overcome the issue of analyte selectivity loss during pre-treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these can still suffer limited selectivity for application to large numbers of chemically diverse CECs as well as the potential for analyte and matrix carryover if the methods are not properly optimised, especially in complex samples. While direct-injection MS methods are still not widely considered for the quantitation of large numbers of CECs due to the potential for significant matrix effects, recently, direct-injection LC-MS of CECs in water has emerged, usually with gradient pre-separation to minimise these effects [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In many cases, this requires the large volume injection (LVI) of sample (typically between 80-5000 µL) and can help overcome the issue of analyte selectivity loss during pre-treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B and C ) considering mobile phase compositions and gradients compiled in Table S1 . Selected columns and mobile phases have been previously reported for AMPA and GLY determination in water samples [ 15 , 22 ]. In the three cases, separations were carried out in the same LC–ESI–MS/MS instrument, under identical conditions as regards ESI parameters and MRM transitions (Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8–10 Although glyphosate is a non-electroactive compound and cannot be measured at an accessible potential, there have been reports of electrochemical sensing of glyphosate by modifying the electrode and processing the sample. 11–13 Prasad et al 14 constructed an electrochemical sensor based on a graphite electrode modified by a dual-template imprinted polymer nanomembrane and used it to detect glyphosate in soil. The linear response range and the limit of detection of the sensor to glyphosate are 3.98–176.23 ng ml −1 and 0.35 ng ml −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%