2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8030211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Semi-Analytical Algorithm for the Retrieval of Suspended Particulate Matter from Remote Sensing over Clear to Very Turbid Waters

Abstract: Remote sensing of suspended particulate matter, SPM, from space has long been used to assess its spatio-temporal variability in various coastal areas. The associated algorithms were generally site specific or developed over a relatively narrow range of concentration, which make them inappropriate for global applications (or at least over broad SPM range). In the frame of the GlobCoast project, a large in situ data set of SPM and remote sensing reflectance, R rs (λ), has been built gathering together measuremen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
99
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(82 reference statements)
2
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of several models adapted to each concentration range is the main reason for this result, together with the selection of the best-fitted models. As proved by other studies [35][36][37], the selection of a specific model combining different bands is an improvement when estimating the SPM concentration in coastal waters. Table 8 shows the in situ-satellite match-up results using different SPM models.…”
Section: Multi-conditional Spm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of several models adapted to each concentration range is the main reason for this result, together with the selection of the best-fitted models. As proved by other studies [35][36][37], the selection of a specific model combining different bands is an improvement when estimating the SPM concentration in coastal waters. Table 8 shows the in situ-satellite match-up results using different SPM models.…”
Section: Multi-conditional Spm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Again, the purpose of this study was not to provide the best SPM models for each area, but to develop a method and test it on selected satellite data recorded for optimal conditions (cloud-free, clear atmosphere) representative of a wide range of SPM concentrations in coastal and estuarine waters. Similar methods have already been developed [35,36], but the procedure presented in the present study (1) automatically selects the model switching bounds based on in situ measurements; (2) fully applies the method to real satellite data provided by three different sensors; and (3) validates the results based on match-ups with field data. …”
Section: Multi-conditional Spm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RSR curves in the visible and NIR bands are shown as dashed lines in Figure 2. Although L8/OLI is not designed for ocean monitoring, its advantages of high spatial resolution and the increased number of bands, combined with its improved signal-tonoise ratio and data quality, make it increasingly used in ocean color remote sensing research and especially in estuarine and coastal research [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Satellite Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These high values are in contrast with those obtained by previous studies [31,42], where the use of red band proved to be suitable for the retrieval of SPMc up to~50 g/m 3 , while the use of the NIR band is more appropriate for higher SPMc values. In order to avoid such unphysical SPM concentrations achieved using only the red band, a combined approach, as previously proposed by [21], can be implemented. Red band R rs can be used for SPMc <~50 g/m 3 , while the NIR one is preferable for higher SPMc values.…”
Section: Satellite Data Processing For Spm Daily Maps Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2) is used for the slightly-to-moderately turbid waters (Rrs(645) ≤ 0.03 sr −1 , corresponding to SPMc < ~50 g/m³), while Equation (3) is applied for more turbid waters (Rrs(645) ≥ 0.04 sr −1 , SPMc > ~150 g/m³). SPMc corresponding to the 0.03 < Rrs < 0.04 sr −1 range is computed using a weighted average, calculating the weights by applying a logarithmic function (see [21] for more details on the methods). Keeping in mind that [10] found, as mentioned above, an error of about 30% and 40% in calibration and validation respectively, it can be speculated that such an error affects at least the absolute SPMc maps computed over BRCW.…”
Section: Satellite Data Processing For Spm Daily Maps Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%