2007 9th International Conference on E-Health Networking, Application and Services 2007
DOI: 10.1109/health.2007.381666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Self-Constructing Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System for Online Classification of Physical Movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural networks are currently the most popular method used in the recognition of signal status [34][35][36], due to their excellent learning capability in the discrimination of nonlinearly separable classes. Watanabe [36] used a feedforward neural network with triaxial accelerometer to recognize the movements of hemiplegic patients.…”
Section: Classifier For Recognizing the Status Of Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neural networks are currently the most popular method used in the recognition of signal status [34][35][36], due to their excellent learning capability in the discrimination of nonlinearly separable classes. Watanabe [36] used a feedforward neural network with triaxial accelerometer to recognize the movements of hemiplegic patients.…”
Section: Classifier For Recognizing the Status Of Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watanabe [36] used a feedforward neural network with triaxial accelerometer to recognize the movements of hemiplegic patients. Jatoba et al [34] utilized an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on signals collected from a triaxial acceleration sensor. Yang et al [25] recently merged a fuzzy system with a neural network to identify human activities based on signals collected using only one accelerometer.…”
Section: Classifier For Recognizing the Status Of Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Decision tree (DT) [22], [23], [36]  K-Nearest-Neighbor classifier (k-NN) [23], [29], [33]  Support Vector Machine (SVM) [23], [24], [25], [27], [34]  Neural network [26], [28], [30] Most classification methods require a training of the classifier. As shown in [23] the classifier results in a worse accuracy if it was trained with a data set that was not obtained from the user.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…walking along a corridor, upstairs or downstairs [36], [37]. All of the cited systems are based on the standard method for classification that can be described as follows:  Standard deviation [23], [24], [30]  Signal entropy [24], [30]  Signal energy [23], [24], [30]  Correlation between the axis of two or all accelerometers [23], [24]  Signal magnitude area (SMA) [22], [28]  Autoregressive coefficients [25], [28]  Frequency derived features [36] Most groups used the Weka toolkit or MatLab for their work. These platforms offer the most common classifiers that were employed as listed in the following:…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%