2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a screening system for agents that modulate taste receptor expression with the CRISPR-Cas9 system in medaka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human gene editing is regulated by strict ethical norms and currently undergoes scientific, philosophical, and political discussion [ 22 , 23 ]; however, in principle, it is executable. Besides the mammals, also genome of reptiles [ 24 ], amphibians ( Xenopus laevis and X. tropicalis ) [ 25 , 26 ], fish ( Danio rerio , Oryzias latipes ) [ 26 28 ], insects ( Drosophila melanogaster , mosquitoes) [ 29 , 30 ], worms ( Caenorhabditis elegans ) [ 31 , 32 ], plants [ 33 35 ], fungi [ 36 , 37 ], bacteria [ 38 ], and viruses [ 39 ] can be edited by CRISPR/Cas9. Paradoxically, using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology is not as common in bacteria as in other organisms, likely because other methods based on homologous recombination were already available for efficient manipulation of their genomes [ 40 ].…”
Section: Technological Innovation By the Crispr/cas Gene Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human gene editing is regulated by strict ethical norms and currently undergoes scientific, philosophical, and political discussion [ 22 , 23 ]; however, in principle, it is executable. Besides the mammals, also genome of reptiles [ 24 ], amphibians ( Xenopus laevis and X. tropicalis ) [ 25 , 26 ], fish ( Danio rerio , Oryzias latipes ) [ 26 28 ], insects ( Drosophila melanogaster , mosquitoes) [ 29 , 30 ], worms ( Caenorhabditis elegans ) [ 31 , 32 ], plants [ 33 35 ], fungi [ 36 , 37 ], bacteria [ 38 ], and viruses [ 39 ] can be edited by CRISPR/Cas9. Paradoxically, using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology is not as common in bacteria as in other organisms, likely because other methods based on homologous recombination were already available for efficient manipulation of their genomes [ 40 ].…”
Section: Technological Innovation By the Crispr/cas Gene Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%