2018
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1466201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a scoring tool (BLARt score) to predict functional outcome in lower limb amputees

Abstract: In the patient cohorts studied, the BLARt assessment tool was a strong predictor of whether or not patients would be able to walk with a prosthetic limb after surgery. It is simple to administer and could be useful in clinical practice to inform expectations for patients and clinicians. Implications for rehabilitation Patients undergoing lower limb amputation face major physical and psychological challenges after surgery that have a considerable impact on rehabilitation and their ability to walk independently.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 The two remaining studies were the only ones to develop a new tool and conduct external validation. 25,26 All but two studies were published in the past 10 years and, therefore, given the small number of studies, no attempt was made to try and compare tools developed at different times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23,24 The two remaining studies were the only ones to develop a new tool and conduct external validation. 25,26 All but two studies were published in the past 10 years and, therefore, given the small number of studies, no attempt was made to try and compare tools developed at different times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine tools provided risk estimations for mortality, 15e17,19e 21,23,24,26 two tools provided post-operative morbidity predictions, 15,23 two for ambulation, 22,25 and one for reamputation to the same or higher level (i.e., TT to TF). 18 No tools were identified to predict QoL or wound healing.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to use a prosthesis safely and e ectively, following above-knee amputation, the individual must have su icient cardiovascular fitness and strength, good balance and dexterity, and good cognitive function. Achieving prosthetic ambulation, therefore, becomes more challenging with age (Bowrey 2018). In addition, the above-knee amputation prosthesis is not comfortable to sit in.…”
Section: Description Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a person spends more time sitting than they do standing and mobilising, they will most likely abandon their prosthesis in favour of their wheelchair. For these reasons, prosthetic fitting post above-knee amputation is not always appropriate in the geriatric population (Bowrey 2018;Davies 2003).…”
Section: Description Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Однако протезирование не всегда гарантирует функциональную подвижность и не всегда может быть самым оптимальным средством передвижения после ампутации [14]. Зачастую лица с ампутированными конечностями не могут ходить на протезах [15]; в некоторых случаях более эффективным будет использование кресла-коляски или костылей [16].…”
Section: обоснованиеunclassified