2018
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a scale of Sense of Community in university online courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, using a portfolio at the end of each module could support students in changing their strategy and monitoring this evolution. It is possible that using a tool like the portfolio can make explicit to the students the collaborative culture of work in the KBC and to check the sense of community among participants (Balboni et al, 2018 ; Cacciamani et al, 2019 ; Perrucci et al, 2012 ). It could be important to verify if the community dimension favouring collaboration has really become part of the member’s experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, using a portfolio at the end of each module could support students in changing their strategy and monitoring this evolution. It is possible that using a tool like the portfolio can make explicit to the students the collaborative culture of work in the KBC and to check the sense of community among participants (Balboni et al, 2018 ; Cacciamani et al, 2019 ; Perrucci et al, 2012 ). It could be important to verify if the community dimension favouring collaboration has really become part of the member’s experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Italian version of the Scale of Sense of Community in University Online Courses (SSC-CUO) by Balboni et al ( 2018 ), based on the model by McMillan and Chavis ( 1986 ), includes 36 items which have been distinguished in three subscales: (1) membership, that measures the quantity/quality of interaction between the members of an online community ( If I don’t understand something, I can rely on the support of the other students attending the course , 19 items); (2) influence, that is the subjective feeling of influencing the course activities ( My participation is relevant to the overall success of the course , six items); (3) fulfilment of needs, the fulfilment of students’ learning needs ( Attending the course is a source of personal satisfaction , 11 items). Items ranged from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) along a Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher sense-of-community.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countering this physical disconnection, virtual communities aim to keep users engaged, as do “physical” communities, by stimulating a sense of belonging, trust, familiarity and perceived similarity (Zhao et al , 2012). Rovai (2002a) shows that courses with a strong sense of community are characterised by “good teacher characteristics, cooperation and strong student connections, consistent flow of information between participants, a change in personal perspective, quality learning, students’ perceived learning, and overall satisfaction” (as cited in Balboni et al , 2018, p. 319). Building upon the work of scholars such as Rovai (2002a) and Liu et al (2007) who studied the (positive) relation between sense of community and learning environments, our central research question here is: What are key elements of an online sustainability education course that foster subjectification, socialisation and a sense of community?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%