2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3507924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Rechargeable Zinc-Air Battery

Abstract: An electrically rechargeable zinc-air cell was developed and demonstrated using a bi-electrode on the cathode side and a 3D zinc electrode. About 200 cycles corresponding to 5000h of operation was achieved with this configuration. An innovating hybrid bi-electrode was evaluated which significantly increase the energy efficiency of our system to about 70% with an energy density close to 110 wh/kg and also improves the power response of the zinc air battery for punctual power demand application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…

ZnÀair batteries have attracted enormous research interest, driven by the promise for vehicle propulsion owing to their advantages of high-level safety, low cost, and high specific energy density. [15][16][17] In addition, the current yearly global zinc production is sufficient to produce enough Zn-air batteries, [18][19][20] which holds overwhelming advantages over the current limited production of lithium that is necessary source for the current dominant lithium ion batteries (LIBs). We demonstrate that the asdesigned ZnÀair battery, thanks to the as-formed concentration cell, can deliver a maximum power density of 380 mW cm À2 and a specific energy density of 1522 Wh kg À1 with an open-circuit voltage of 2.25 V. The as-proposed ZnÀair battery performance is superior to the conventional ZnÀair battery in terms of these pivotal performance parameters.

Energy crisis and environmental pollutions caused by the consumption of fossil fuels have stimulated great interests in developing renewable energy sources.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…

ZnÀair batteries have attracted enormous research interest, driven by the promise for vehicle propulsion owing to their advantages of high-level safety, low cost, and high specific energy density. [15][16][17] In addition, the current yearly global zinc production is sufficient to produce enough Zn-air batteries, [18][19][20] which holds overwhelming advantages over the current limited production of lithium that is necessary source for the current dominant lithium ion batteries (LIBs). We demonstrate that the asdesigned ZnÀair battery, thanks to the as-formed concentration cell, can deliver a maximum power density of 380 mW cm À2 and a specific energy density of 1522 Wh kg À1 with an open-circuit voltage of 2.25 V. The as-proposed ZnÀair battery performance is superior to the conventional ZnÀair battery in terms of these pivotal performance parameters.

Energy crisis and environmental pollutions caused by the consumption of fossil fuels have stimulated great interests in developing renewable energy sources.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, despite the CHF electrode not being modified by catalytically active heteroatoms and metal‐containing species, [EMIM] + cations will play as the promoter to initiate CO 2 reduction. Metallic zinc is selected as the anode based on the following considerations: 1) Zn enjoys proper reactivity to drive CO 2 methanation ( E o Zn2+/Zn = −0.762 vs E° CO2/CH4 = 0.17 V); 2) Zn electrode, and even Zn 2+ ions, display unique activity in the enhancement of CO 2 electrochemical reduction; 3) it is easy to revert the oxidized Zn anode to Zn 0 by an electrochemical method, thus making the Zn–CO 2 battery renewable; 4) Zn is an earth‐abundant and inexpensive metal that is capable of sustaining mass production of the battery …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These solutions may be effective for grid energy storage applications, but they add cost and complexity to the system. Furthermore, there have been several reports incorporating tri‐electrode designs, where the OER and ORR catalysts are separated to improve ZAB performance . A tri‐electrode design has its drawbacks, however, since the design is more complex and the specific energy is invariably reduced by the extra mass associated with extra OER electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%