Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2009.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Reading Material Recommendation System Based on a Multi-expert Knowledge Acquisition Approach

Abstract: In English courses, it is very important to assign proper articles to individual students for training their reading ability. This study proposes an innovative approach for developing reading material recommendation systems by eliciting domain knowledge from multiple experts. An experiment has been conducted to evaluate the performance of the approach; moreover, a comparison on the existing approaches is given to show the advantages of applying the innovative approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommendation is produced by computing the similarity between the user's preferences and services descriptions. Hsu et al (2009Hsu et al ( , 2010 propose a reading material recommendation system. The domain knowledge of various experts is elicited in order to propose articles to individual students so that they can train their reading ability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The recommendation is produced by computing the similarity between the user's preferences and services descriptions. Hsu et al (2009Hsu et al ( , 2010 propose a reading material recommendation system. The domain knowledge of various experts is elicited in order to propose articles to individual students so that they can train their reading ability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see, the range of KBRS varies depending mainly on the nature of the Knowledge Base, which influences the recommendation strategy. While some authors propose a knowledge base allowing a (conversational) case-based recommendation technique (Aktas et al, 2004;Burke, 1999;Chattopadhyay et al, 2012;Göker & Thompson, 2000;Khan & Hoffmann, 2003;Lee, 2004bLee, , 2004aLee & Lee, 2007;Yuan et al, 2013); other use a knowledge base containing formalized expert knowledge (Hsu et al, 2010(Hsu et al, , 2009Rosenfeld et al, 2013), a domain ontology (Ajmani et al, 2013;Blanco-Fernandez et al, 2008Carrer-Neto et al, 2012;Garcìa -Crespo et al, 2009;Kaminskas et al, 2012;), or a database (Ghani & Fano, 2002;Martinez et al, 2008;Towle & Quinn, 2000) and apply a similarity measure to generate a recommendation. Despite the differences between the recommendation methodologies, we can identify two common elements to each of the KBRS considered here: a Knowledge Base and a User Profile.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations