2019
DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2019.1595136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For OPERA, a lower LogWS (logarithm of water solubility) and a higher MP (melting point) contributed to a negative prediction in both tasks, showing consistency with the reportedly important properties. 16,18,38 As for attention weights learned by Attentive FP, following the same way as its original paper, 27 we first used min-max normalization to rescale the attention weights within a graph to the range of 0 to 1. Next, the normalized attention weight of each node, which was derived from the first graph-level attention layer, was visualized to provide an interpretation based on the atomic contributions.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For OPERA, a lower LogWS (logarithm of water solubility) and a higher MP (melting point) contributed to a negative prediction in both tasks, showing consistency with the reportedly important properties. 16,18,38 As for attention weights learned by Attentive FP, following the same way as its original paper, 27 we first used min-max normalization to rescale the attention weights within a graph to the range of 0 to 1. Next, the normalized attention weight of each node, which was derived from the first graph-level attention layer, was visualized to provide an interpretation based on the atomic contributions.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPERA was selected because of its ability to calculate reportedly important properties like water solubility and melting point. 16,18,38 We also trained Attentive FP on molecular graph, which is a state-of-the-art GNN architecture designed for molecular tasks, 28 to provide the first GNN model for Skin Corr./Irrit.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational evaluation of structural alerts was conducted with OECD QSAR Toolbox 4.2 , and VEGA , as shown in Table . These alerts predict properties associated with the toxic effects of chemicals, such as DNA and protein covalent binding and are based on functional groups known to undergo these reactions, either directly or upon biotransformation to a reactive metabolite.…”
Section: Methods For Clustering a Chemical Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 The endpoints of interest include both systemic toxicity, such as in vivo genotoxicity and developmental-reproductive toxicity, and local toxicity, such as skin sensitization or respiratory toxicity. 11 All of these approaches use Tanimoto or other structural similarity scores 12 as a rudimentary basis to identify similar chemicals calculated from either SMILES or fingerprints. 13 The main drawback of clustering an inventory based on such scores is that the substructural features, which can affect toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic properties, are not weighted according to their impact on the toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation