2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a rapid and sensitive immunosensor for the detection of bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed sensor analysis time (20 minutes) is comparable to the time reported in the other rapid methods . Although some of the nanotechnology‐based methods reported in Table for comparison can detect the presence of the bacteria in 1 to 5 minutes, the major advantages of the biosensor we proposed over the other rapid techniques are the simplicity of the design and the low cost of fabrication in addition to the highly electivity of bacteriophage while maintaining a rapid response (20 minutes).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed sensor analysis time (20 minutes) is comparable to the time reported in the other rapid methods . Although some of the nanotechnology‐based methods reported in Table for comparison can detect the presence of the bacteria in 1 to 5 minutes, the major advantages of the biosensor we proposed over the other rapid techniques are the simplicity of the design and the low cost of fabrication in addition to the highly electivity of bacteriophage while maintaining a rapid response (20 minutes).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To increase sensitivity and shorten testing time for food samples, several types of biosensors have been proposed using nanotechnology, the best of which are optical‐based sensors. Several optical sensors were proposed based on colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and plasmonic signal detection . These systems can provide reliable results in few minutes, but many of these systems are expensive, toxic (needs special handling), and/or complex in design, fabrication, and testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antibody (2.5 µg/mL) addition resulted in a wavelength shift to 532 nm and decreased the absorbance peak to 1.16 (blue line). This change has indicated antibody binding to AuNPs, as reported in the literature [30]. Two pig serum samples testing positive for PCV-2 concentrations were added.…”
Section: Biosensor Developmentmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Another study that utilizes the antibody functionalized AuNPs for detection of Lactobacillus spp. and Staphylococcus aureus was presented by Verdoot et al [74]. In this case the local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) band of the AuNPs is monitored by means of UV–Vis spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%