2006
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a questionnaire to assess worker knowledge, attitudes and perceptions underlying dermal exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
23
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants reported decreased perception of workplace safety during times of high workflow. The current study confirmed the influence of high workload, measured by nurse–patient ratio, as a significant barrier to nurse HD precaution adoption; mean number of patients assigned per day proved the only significant predictor of HD precaution use, with more patients assigned per day predicting less nurse HD precaution use controlling for self-efficacy, perceived risk, and workplace safety (Geer, Curbow, Anna, Lees, & Buckley, 2006; Mahon et al, 1994; Valanis, McNeil, & Driscoll, 1991). In contrast, Polovich and Clark (2012) found that two additional theoretical predictor variables, perceived barriers and workplace safety climate, significantly influenced HD precaution use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Participants reported decreased perception of workplace safety during times of high workflow. The current study confirmed the influence of high workload, measured by nurse–patient ratio, as a significant barrier to nurse HD precaution adoption; mean number of patients assigned per day proved the only significant predictor of HD precaution use, with more patients assigned per day predicting less nurse HD precaution use controlling for self-efficacy, perceived risk, and workplace safety (Geer, Curbow, Anna, Lees, & Buckley, 2006; Mahon et al, 1994; Valanis, McNeil, & Driscoll, 1991). In contrast, Polovich and Clark (2012) found that two additional theoretical predictor variables, perceived barriers and workplace safety climate, significantly influenced HD precaution use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The internal reliability of our dependent variable – the PPE use scale – was lower in our sample (0.61) than reported previously (Geer et al, 2006). The distribution of various types of PPE (included on the PPE use scale) had a bimodal pattern; many respondents either reported using PPE very frequently or never.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Nurses’ reported barriers to wearing PPE were measured from 13 items in Geer’s Dermal Exposure Survey (Geer, Curbow, Anna, Lees, & Buckley, 2006). Nurses scored items on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5); the mean across all 13 items was used in analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training programme implemented had helped to overcome these barriers, and as a result the respondents continued to use the PPE. Geer et al, (2006) also proved that the self-protective behaviours work well, when the worker feels that they are informed about the risks, and believe that precautionary methods are effective and has a clearer perception about their own ability to avoid or control exposure.…”
Section: Pre and Post Kap Survey Findingsmentioning
confidence: 86%