2008
DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-5-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours

Abstract: Background: Systematic reviews based on the critical appraisal of observational and analytic studies on HIV prevalence and risk factors for HIV transmission among men having sex with men are very useful for health care decisions and planning. Such appraisal is particularly difficult, however, as the quality assessment tools available for use with observational and analytic studies are poorly established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
185
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
185
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality for the studies was assessed using an instrument (Table 2) adapted from previous systematic reviews by Louw et al (2007), Wong et al (2008), Roman and Frantz (2013) as well as Davids and Roman (2014). The final sample consisted of 14 articles which were included in the systematic review (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodological Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological quality for the studies was assessed using an instrument (Table 2) adapted from previous systematic reviews by Louw et al (2007), Wong et al (2008), Roman and Frantz (2013) as well as Davids and Roman (2014). The final sample consisted of 14 articles which were included in the systematic review (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodological Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological quality for the studies was assessed using an instrument ( Table 1) adapted from previous systematic reviews that focussed on reviewing prevalence studies [47][48][49]. The tool was adapted because it only focused on one variable whereas we included the assessment of another variable for this review.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, family structure included biological parents, biological mother only, biological father only, other relatives and uncorrelated residents [53]. Other studies included grandparents and other relatives as part of the family structure such as an aunt or uncle [48]. Another article refers to the family structure in terms of one nuclear or two nuclear; or one extended and two extended [55].…”
Section: Family Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cut-off has been used in previous systematic reviews of observational studies. 25,26 We identified pertinent confounders through the literature and included demographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, marital status and socioeconomic status (SES)), health variables (chronic conditions and self-reported health) and lifestyle variables (physical activity, smoking status). Reporting on the methodological aspects of the studies rather than relying on a numerical score for quality is considered more appropriate for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%