Arguments in support of any particular superconducting coating must be framed in terms
of its fundamental thermodynamic properties. The superconducting transition temperature,
Tc, determines the surface resistance, and thus the
Q
of the cavity. This must remain sufficiently high that the system can be driven at the required
field gradients and frequencies without leading to excessive power loss. In this regard the 39 K
Tc of
MgB2
is advantageous. With an anticipated maximum accelerating field,
EaccMAX, of
77 MV m−1 and a BCS surface
resistance, RsBCS (4 K,
500 MHz), of 2.5 n Ω as
discussed later, MgB2
represents an interesting possibility as a coating for SRF cavities. In addition, the higher
Hc2 of
MgB2
than Nb results in a slightly lower estimated trapped flux sensitivity. Recent measurements of an
MgB2
film at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) have shown an RF surface resistance
lower than that of Nb at 4 K, which is proof-of-principle evidence of the attractiveness of
MgB2. Our calculations are based conservatively on 4 K operation at 500 MHz. However, with a
Tc of
39 K, MgB2-coated cavities should be less susceptible to thermal breakdown than
low-Tc
ones. Superconducting materials for use at GHz frequencies at voltage gradients
>40 MV m−1, a recently cited target, will require both low
Rs (high
Tc) and high
Hsh values. With
a Tc of 39 K,
MgB2 clearly has the
potential to reduce RsBCS
if the films are well prepared and free from defects and particles. Additionally, while the
Hc1
for MgB2
is relatively low, the superheating critical field,
Hsh, is higher than that of Nb. Currently, there is some debate about the exact roles of
Hc1 and
Hsh in the determination
of Eacc limits. However,
the higher values of Hsh
for MgB2 do suggest the
possibility of enhanced Eacc
values. The exact roles of Hc1
and Hsh
should be further investigated. Techniques exist that may enable cavity-like structures to be internally coated
with a MgB2
film.