2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a prognostic scale for severely hemiplegic stroke patients in a rehabilitation hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality of the two case-control studies 19 , 20 was moderate (scores 5 and 6 out of 9), showing the risk of bias for comparability of cases and controls and the ascertainment of exposure in both studies and for the adequacy of case definition in one study. 19 The methodological quality of cohort studies 8 , 9 , 17 , 18 , 21 59 was moderate to high (score from 6 to 9 out of 9, except for one study that score 4 out of 9), 60 showing risk of bias for the comparability of the groups, primarily because no adjustment for confounders was reported, for the representativeness of the exposed cohorts, assessment of outcomes, adequacy of follow-up of cohorts, and ascertainment of exposure ( Supplemental File 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodological quality of the two case-control studies 19 , 20 was moderate (scores 5 and 6 out of 9), showing the risk of bias for comparability of cases and controls and the ascertainment of exposure in both studies and for the adequacy of case definition in one study. 19 The methodological quality of cohort studies 8 , 9 , 17 , 18 , 21 59 was moderate to high (score from 6 to 9 out of 9, except for one study that score 4 out of 9), 60 showing risk of bias for the comparability of the groups, primarily because no adjustment for confounders was reported, for the representativeness of the exposed cohorts, assessment of outcomes, adequacy of follow-up of cohorts, and ascertainment of exposure ( Supplemental File 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor activities of daily living on admission: From 13 studies 20 , 25 – 28 , 31 , 32 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 49 , 57 assessing the motor Functional Independence Measure, four studies 27 , 31 , 32 , 41 of moderate and high quality (score 9 n = 2, score 8 n = 1, score 7 n = 1) were included in the meta-analysis of odds ratio ( Figure 2(a) ) and showed significant results with high heterogeneity (odds ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.12–1.35, I 2 = 99%). The result was also significant when the outlier 27 was removed (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.11, I 2 = 95%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline status was associated with post-rehabilitation prognosis even in patients with hemiplegia. 6 ) In addition, early start of rehabilitation is considered to be important for predicting the effect of rehabilitation, 13 , 25 ) although the definition of early rehabilitation may vary. Recently, increasing evidence has shown that starting rehabilitation within the first 2 weeks of stroke is beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between imaging findings and the functional prognosis, 4 , 5 ) status of ADL before the onset, 2 ) and prognosis prediction based on a scoring system have all been evaluated. 6 ) The established prognostic factors for acute stroke rehabilitation are generally accepted to be age and the severity of the onset of paralysis. 7 ) Ween et al reported that patients younger than 55 years or with a Functional Independence Measure (FIM) greater than 80 on admission were almost universally able to return home, while those with a FIM less than 40 were closely associated with discharge to a nursing home.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The verticality item of the SIAS, i.e., the trunk function, influenced outcome in low ADL patients with FIM-M on admission of less than 19. This is thought to be because one of the predictive factors for ADL improvement is whether sitting is or is not possible in severely disabled people [2,12].…”
Section: Effects Of Trunk Function Age and Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%