2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a preoperative risk-scoring system for predicting poor responders to peroral endoscopic myotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 244 patients undergoing POEM for esophageal motility disorders at a single center were retrospectively included in their study. 34 Poor responders were defined as patients with any of the following at 1-year follow-up: ES ⩾3, endoscopic findings of food retention, and retreatments (endoscopic balloon dilation, re-POEM, and surgical myotomy). All others were deemed good responders.…”
Section: Endoscopic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 244 patients undergoing POEM for esophageal motility disorders at a single center were retrospectively included in their study. 34 Poor responders were defined as patients with any of the following at 1-year follow-up: ES ⩾3, endoscopic findings of food retention, and retreatments (endoscopic balloon dilation, re-POEM, and surgical myotomy). All others were deemed good responders.…”
Section: Endoscopic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available data suggests that the probability of clinical failure is higher in those with pretreatment Eckardt score ≥ 9, previous treatment, intraprocedural mucosal injury, reflux, and esophageal dilatation (≥ grade II or ≥ 3.5 cm). [59][60][61] The Eckardt score is a symptom-based score and comprises four distinct symptoms including dysphagia (0-3), regurgitation (0-3), chest pain (0-3) and weight loss (0-3), whereas esophageal dilatation is graded as grade I (< 3.5 cm), grade II (≥ 3.5-6 cm) and grade III (> 6 cm). 60 In two recent studies, risk-scoring systems were devised using these risk factors to predict clinical failure after POEM.…”
Section: Predictors Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Urakami et al 9 attempt to address this question by using data analysis to create a predictive scoring model to assign a percentage risk of treatment failure and need for retreatment based on pre-POEM patient characteristics. The authors based this model on a retrospective analysis of 244 patients who underwent POEM between April 2015 and March 2019, and they identified poor responders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, another study by Liu et al 10 has attempted to similarly create a risk-scoring system to predict POEM outcomes. However, unlike the study by Liu et al, 10 which included a number of peri-and postoperative outcomes such as intraoperative injury or the development of postoperative acid reflux, Urakami et al 9 used only preoperative risk factors, which the authors argue increases the clinical utility of this score.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation