2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a predictive model for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in faeces by quantitative real time PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Faecal DNA was isolated from 200 mg of faecal samples, using a commercially available kit (Stool DNA Isolation kit, Qiagen, Germany) with previously described modifications (Kralik et al 2011). The DNA was subsequently mixed from all the animals within a group and used for amplification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faecal DNA was isolated from 200 mg of faecal samples, using a commercially available kit (Stool DNA Isolation kit, Qiagen, Germany) with previously described modifications (Kralik et al 2011). The DNA was subsequently mixed from all the animals within a group and used for amplification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results agree with those of Khol et al (2010) in that Map shedding was detected from 12 months of age and that as time advances shedding increased logarithmically from 10 2 to 10 6 copies of IS900 of Map (bovines 1, 10 and 25; Table 4). Kralik et al (2011) developed a predictive model to determine the shedding of Map using Q-PCR with DNA extracted from feces, establishing that the minimum detectable shedding is 10 2 copies of IS900 of Map per gram of feces. The results obtained agree with those of kralik et al (2011), because in the first sampling three animals were detected as positive and the quantification was obtained as 1.9 to 5.30 × 10 2 copies of IS900 of Map per gram of feces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, mistakes in DNA extraction or sample contamination could also explain the results and it cannot be excluded (Khol et al, 2010). Correlation between bacteriological culture and Q-PCR depends on the stage of the infection present in the individual at the time of sample collection which has an effect on the amount of bacilli shed (Kralik et al, 2011;Aly et al, 2010;Pinedo et al, 2008). The ELISA used in the study detected less number of animals as positive, this is because, in early infection stages the predominant immune response is cell type, and the elimination of bacillus in feces begins in an intermediate way.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations