2020
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a practical prediction scoring system for severe acute organophosphate poisoning

Abstract: Acute organophosphorus poisoning (AOPP) is a serious public health issue, especially in the rural areas. This study was designed to establish a scoring system to assess the risk of cases with severe AOPP. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at two independent hospitals. The derivation cohort included 444 patients with AOPP and the validation cohort included 274 patients. A risk score for patients with severe AOPP was developed. The rates of severe AOPP cases were 20.7% and 20.1% in the derivation and va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that routine clinical parameters, if observed repeatedly, might be useful clinical tools to identify high-risk groups of patients who might experience considerably high mortality. The mortality in our study is comparable to previously published papers on OP poisoning from different regions, including neighbouring countries [4,9,18,27,[40][41][42]; however, our study appeared to show higher (13.4%) mortality compared to a published paper (4.11%) [42] from another tertiary care setting in our metropolitan city. Although the average ages of patients in their study and our study were comparable, a significantly higher percentage of women (73%) was enrolled in the previously published study [42] than in our study (52.5%).…”
Section: Summary Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings suggest that routine clinical parameters, if observed repeatedly, might be useful clinical tools to identify high-risk groups of patients who might experience considerably high mortality. The mortality in our study is comparable to previously published papers on OP poisoning from different regions, including neighbouring countries [4,9,18,27,[40][41][42]; however, our study appeared to show higher (13.4%) mortality compared to a published paper (4.11%) [42] from another tertiary care setting in our metropolitan city. Although the average ages of patients in their study and our study were comparable, a significantly higher percentage of women (73%) was enrolled in the previously published study [42] than in our study (52.5%).…”
Section: Summary Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Commonly used scoring systems heavily depend on clinical and laboratory investigational information [4,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Furthermore, most scoring systems rely on single measurements, usually at the time of patient admission. The LCGA used in this study is a person-centred approach in which latent classes identify trajectories of patients based on repeated measures of very routine clinical parameters [54] .…”
Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…revealed a rise in serum amylase in acute OP poisoning with significant P value. [ 20 ] In this study, mean amylase level was highest in to Group III and showed significant negative correlation with plasma cholinesterase levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%