2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Potent, Specific CDK8 Kinase Inhibitor Which Phenocopies CDK8/19 Knockout Cells

Abstract: Beginning with promiscuous COT inhibitors, which were found to inhibit CDK8, a series of 6-aza-benzothiophene containing compounds were developed into potent, selective CDK8 inhibitors. When cocrystallized with CDK8 and cyclin C, these compounds exhibit an unusual binding mode, making a single hydrogen bond to the hinge residue A100, a second to K252, and a key cation-π interaction with R356. Structure-based drug design resulted in tool compounds 13 and 32, which are highly potent, kinase selective, permeable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
62
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the potent inhibition of reporter activity we were surprised by the lack of effect of our potent inhibitors on tumor cell proliferation after standard 4 d continuous exposure conditions (Figure 1—source data 1). However, this was consistent with a reported lack of antiproliferative effects for a different chemical series in a single colorectal cancer cell line (Koehler et al, 2016). Silencing of CDK8 and/or CDK19 by shRNA in CDK8 -amplified COLO205 cells also had no effect on viability, despite evidence for inhibition of reporter output or target gene expression (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Given the potent inhibition of reporter activity we were surprised by the lack of effect of our potent inhibitors on tumor cell proliferation after standard 4 d continuous exposure conditions (Figure 1—source data 1). However, this was consistent with a reported lack of antiproliferative effects for a different chemical series in a single colorectal cancer cell line (Koehler et al, 2016). Silencing of CDK8 and/or CDK19 by shRNA in CDK8 -amplified COLO205 cells also had no effect on viability, despite evidence for inhibition of reporter output or target gene expression (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, considering their enzymatic activity, CDK19 and CDK8 might be more amenable to inhibition by small molecule compounds that Mediator subunits which exclusively act as transcription factors. Based on these observations, both CDK8 and CDK19 have emerged as promising therapeutic targets leading to the development of small molecule inhibitors impeding CDK8 and CDK19 activity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these observations, both CDK8 and CDK19 have emerged as promising therapeutic targets leading to the development of small molecule inhibitors impeding CDK8 and CDK19 activity. 22,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] In a recent systematic analysis of Mediator complex expression across all major cancer entities using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we identified high CDK19 RNA expression specifically in prostate cancer (PCa). 36 Subsequent in vitro experiments highlighted the potential functional implication of CDK19 in PCa progression mainly by promoting the metastatic potential of PCa cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the obvious importance of Mediator in gene expression control, little is known about shared and unique functions of the CDK-module paralogs. Recently, a number of dual inhibitors of CDK8 and CDK19 have been developed, including Cortistatin A, Senexin A, CCT251921 and MSC2530818 (Cee et al, 2009; Clarke et al, 2016; Czodrowski et al, 2016; Dale et al, 2015; Koehler et al, 2016; Mallinger et al, 2015; Mallinger et al, 2016a; Mallinger et al, 2016b; Porter et al, 2012; Schiemann et al, 2016). While many of these compounds appear to have efficacy against cancer cell lines in vitro , it remains unclear whether the effects are due to inhibition of CDK8, CDK19 or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%