2017
DOI: 10.4172/2469-4134.1000193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Point-based Method for Map Validation and Confidence Interval Estimation: A Case Study of Burned Areas in Amazonia

Abstract: Forest fires and their associated emissions are a key component for the efficient implementation of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) policy. The most suitable method for quantifying large scale fire-associated impacts is by mapping burned areas using remote sensing data. However, to provide robust quantification of the impacts of fire and support coherent policy decisions, these thematic maps must have their accuracy quantitatively assessed. The aim of this research is t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maps containing burned area information from 2008 to 2012 were provided by the Tropical Ecosystems and Environmental Science Laboratory (TREES) at the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE). This dataset was generated following a well-established methodology [15,[39][40][41]. These maps are derived from MODIS surface reflectance products collection 5, which were resampled to 250 m of spatial resolution and subsequently processed by applying a Spectral Mixture Analysis (SMA) with vegetation, soil, and shade endmembers [42].…”
Section: Spatial Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps containing burned area information from 2008 to 2012 were provided by the Tropical Ecosystems and Environmental Science Laboratory (TREES) at the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE). This dataset was generated following a well-established methodology [15,[39][40][41]. These maps are derived from MODIS surface reflectance products collection 5, which were resampled to 250 m of spatial resolution and subsequently processed by applying a Spectral Mixture Analysis (SMA) with vegetation, soil, and shade endmembers [42].…”
Section: Spatial Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, larger the sample size, better the precision. Few important considerations in determining sample size are accuracy, cost and workload (Anderson et al 2017). In the case of a stratified random sampling of LULC classes, sample number could be calculated using the equation given by Cochran (1977).…”
Section: Post-claslite Unsupervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a parameter estimate used in accuracy assessment (e.g. user's accuracy) without a CI might be misleading, as it provides an impression of certainty which might not be the case (Anderson et al 2017). Hence, it was recommended that estimates of parameters used in accuracy assessment of maps should be accompanied with a CI (Foody 2004;Olofsson et al 2013;Strahler et al 2006), as it gives a range of values of the estimated parameter along with margin of error (confidence interval) in estimation.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessment Of Lulc Change Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations