1996
DOI: 10.3354/dao025123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a PCR procedure for the detection of Baculovirus penaei in shrimp

Abstract: ABSTRACT-A PCR-based detection procedure for Baculovirus penaei (BP) was developed Three forward and 3 reverse primers were designed to provide 6 primer-pa~r combinations with PCR products ranging in size from 196 to 933 bp. The expected ampl~flcation products were o b t a~n e d when template DNA isolated from postlarval Penaeus vannamei exper~mentally infected with BP In the laboratory or from wild-caught BP-~nfected juvenile P aztecus were used. DNA isolated from speclfic pathogen-free P vannamel dld not yle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some problems have been reported with copurification of PCR inhibitors in nucleic acid extraction tests with alternative template sources such as hepatopancreatic tissue and post larvae (Wang et al 1996, Belcher & Young 1998. The salting-out procedure does not eliminate inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some problems have been reported with copurification of PCR inhibitors in nucleic acid extraction tests with alternative template sources such as hepatopancreatic tissue and post larvae (Wang et al 1996, Belcher & Young 1998. The salting-out procedure does not eliminate inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PCR is considered a very sensitive technique, it has several disadvantages. Crude homogenates of some shrimp tissues may contain interfering compounds that can lead to false positive or false negative results (Wang et al 1996, Nunan et al 2000. The appearance of early 2-step positive results in F5, F6, and F8 at 30, 45, and 30 DPS, respectively, followed by several negative test results may have been examples of 2-step PCR false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become one of the most harmful viral pathogens to the worldwide shrimp industry (Rosenberry 2002). Diagnosis is based on clinical signs and laboratory tests, including histological analysis (Lightner 1996), Western blot and immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies (Nadala et al 1997, Magbanua et al 2000, Nadala & Loh 2000, Poulos et al 2001, Anil et al 2002, dot-blot and in situ hybridization using gene probes (Durand et al 1996, Nunan & Lightner 1997, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Wang et al 1995, Lo et al 1996 and real time PCR (Durand & Lightner 2002). In most cases, the clinical signs such as lethargy, reduction in food consumption and reddish coloration are not pathognomonic (Lightner 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%