Development of a novel strategy for robust synthetic bacterial promoters based on a stepwise evolution targeting the spacer region of the core promoter in Bacillus subtilis

Abstract

Background Promoter evolution by synthetic promoter library (SPL) is a powerful approach to development of functional synthetic promoters to synthetic biology. However, it requires much tedious and time-consuming screenings because of the plethora of different variants in SPL. Actually, a large proportion of mutants in the SPL are significantly lower in strength, which contributes only to fabrication of a promoter library with a continuum of strength. Thus, to effectively obtain the evolved synthetic promoter exhibiting higher strength, it is essential to develop novel strategies to construct mutant library targeting the pivotal region rather than the arbitrary region of the template promoter. In this study, a strategy termed stepwise evolution targeting the spacer of core promoter (SETarSCoP) was established in Bacillus subtilis to effectively evolve the strength of bacterial promoter. Results The native promoter, P srfA , from B. subtilis , which exhibits higher strength than the strong promoter P43, was set as the parental template. According to the comparison of conservation of the spacer sequences between − 35 box and − 10 box among a set of strong and weak native promoter, it revealed that 7-bp sequence immediately upstream of the − 10 box featured in the regulation of promoter strength. Based on the conservative feature, two rounds of consecutive evolution were performed targeting the hot region of P srfA . In the first round, a primary promoter mutation library (pPML) was constructed by mutagenesis targeting the 3-bp sequence immediately upstream of the − 10 box of the P srfA . Subsequently, four evolved mutants from pPML were selected to construction of four secondary promoter mutation libraries (sPMLs) based on mutagenesis of the 4-bp sequence upstream of the first-round target. After the consecutive two-step evolution, the mutant P BH4 was identified and verified to be a highly evolved synthetic promoter. The strength of P BH4 was higher than P srfA by approximately 3 times. Moreover, P BH4 also exhibited broad suitability for different cargo proteins, such as β-glucuronidase and nattokinase. The proof-of-principle test showed that SETarSCoP successfully evolved both constitutive and inducible promoters. Conclusion Comparing with the commonly used SPL strategy, SETarSCoP facilitates the evolution process to obtain strength-evolved synthetic bacterial promoter through fabrication and screening of small-scale mutation libraries. This strategy will be a promising method to evolve diverse bacterial promoters to expand the toolbox for synthetic biology. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12934-019-1148-3) contains suppleme...

Production of Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) by Microorganisms: An Overview

“…However, most effort was applied to regulation modification of the B. subtilis rib operon and overexpression of structural genes ribDGEABH (Table 3; Abbas and Sibirny, 2011;Lee, 2015). Highly effective riboflavin production strains were constructed by introducing additional copies of ribDGEABH genes controlled by strong native or strength-evolved synthetic bacterial and phage promoters (Lee, 2015;Cisternas et al, 2018;Han et al, 2019).…”

Advances on systems metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis as a chassis cell

“…Averesch et al [ 100 ] used adaptive evolution to produce mutants that can metabolize xylose and compared the pABA production capacity from different carbon sources. Han et al [ 101 ] increased the promoter strength of B. subtilis by approximately 3-fold by constructing mutant libraries. Chakravorty et al [ 98 ] developed the rational thermostable mutation prediction tool RankProt, which provides a theoretical basis for evolution-based engineering.…”

Realization of Robust and Precise Regulation of Gene Expression by Multiple Sigma Recognizable Artificial Promoters

“…In this study, all plasmids were constructed by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Gibson Assembly as described previously (Han et al, 2019). The primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2.…”