2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0959-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a novel magnetic resonance imaging acquisition and analysis workflow for the quantification of shock wave lithotripsy-induced renal hemorrhagic injury

Abstract: Introduction The current accepted standard for quantifying shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)-induced tissue damage is based on morphometric detection of renal hemorrhage in serial tissue sections from fixed kidneys. This methodology is time and labor intensive and is tissue destructive. We have developed a non-destructive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method that permits rapid assessment of SWL-induced hemorrhagic lesion volumes in post-mortem kidneys using native tissue contrast to reduce cycle time. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Handa et al developed a method to quantify the hemorrhagic injury to kidneys post ESWL using a Multi-Spectral Neural Network (MSNN) classifier for segmentation and classification of MRI images. The model achieved a high accuracy (79%) and the prediction values correlated very well (R = 0.96) with the morphology [29]. [30,31].…”
Section: Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (Eswl)mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Handa et al developed a method to quantify the hemorrhagic injury to kidneys post ESWL using a Multi-Spectral Neural Network (MSNN) classifier for segmentation and classification of MRI images. The model achieved a high accuracy (79%) and the prediction values correlated very well (R = 0.96) with the morphology [29]. [30,31].…”
Section: Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (Eswl)mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…When compared with standard morphometric analysis, there was strong correlation between predicted and actual lesion volumes (0.97). This demonstrates the potential of a semi-automated approach to quantify renal injury after SWL [46]. Notably, the use of ex vivo kidneys for this study greatly improves the signal-to-noise ratio that can make machine learning challenging in this context.…”
Section: Shockwave Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Apart from this, interstitial fibrosis occurs with segmental shrinkage of renal cortex. [11][12][13] In addition to these changes, pressure waves (when ESWL procedures are applied frequently), can thrust the stone fragments in the neighborhood of renal mucosa. Yuruk et al 10 noted, shrank calyceal infundibulum and submerged stone chips underneath the pelvicalyceal mucosal layer in patients who earlier undertook sessions of failed SWL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%