2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control &Amp; Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/i2cacis52118.2021.9495876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM) with Unknown Loads using Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of the DRO model is achieved by replacing the last layer of the pre-trained model. As a result, the network without DRO addition obtained an F1-score of 0.85 ± 0.061 when using the V-I trajectory map as the input, while the model with DRO addition achieved an F1-score of 0.9058 ± 0.077; SVM (Hernandez A S et al, 2021) achieved an F1score of 0.787 ± 0.091, and KNN obtained an F1-score of 0.77 ± 0.07. When using the Euclidean distance matrix to represent the appliance features, the model with DRO addition achieved an F1-score of 0.87 ± 0.025, which is about 5% higher than the model without DRO addition and 15% higher than the traditional machine learning methods, SVM and KNN.…”
Section: Results On the Lilacdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of the DRO model is achieved by replacing the last layer of the pre-trained model. As a result, the network without DRO addition obtained an F1-score of 0.85 ± 0.061 when using the V-I trajectory map as the input, while the model with DRO addition achieved an F1-score of 0.9058 ± 0.077; SVM (Hernandez A S et al, 2021) achieved an F1score of 0.787 ± 0.091, and KNN obtained an F1-score of 0.77 ± 0.07. When using the Euclidean distance matrix to represent the appliance features, the model with DRO addition achieved an F1-score of 0.87 ± 0.025, which is about 5% higher than the model without DRO addition and 15% higher than the traditional machine learning methods, SVM and KNN.…”
Section: Results On the Lilacdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, more transient features were introduced [12], including active and reactive power changes [13], V-I trajectory [14], current harmonic characteristics [15], and phase noise [16]. Regarding load monitoring algorithms, they can be categorized into combinatorial optimization [17] and pattern recognition [18], including algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM) [19], random forest (RF) [20], K-nearest neighbors (KNN) [21], hidden Markov models (HMM) [22], deep learning [23,24], and others. With the advancement of NILM technology, its applications have expanded from residential homes to commercial buildings [25,26], data centers [27], and smart homes with energy storage, PVs, and electric vehicles [28].…”
Section: Of 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayes classifier has also been proved to be an efficient energy disaggregation approach under non-intrusive strategy [20], and further supports the unsupervised non-parametric modeling with other appliance operation patterns, such as time of usage [21]. Support vector machine (SVM), another typical pattern recognition approach, has been explored for the NILM problem, even for addressing the unknown appliances [22]. Demonstrated to be effective, investigating NILM algorithms based on pattern recognition emerge as a hot topic in academic field, and various approaches including principal component analysis (PCA) [23], non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) [24], and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) [25] are all verified to be contributions.…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%