2020
DOI: 10.1111/cge.13832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new expanded next‐generation sequencing panel for genetic diseases involved in dyslipidemia

Abstract: The aim of this study was to provide an efficient tool: reliable, able to increase the molecular diagnosis performance, to facilitate the detection of copy number variants (CNV), to assess genetic risk scores (wGRS) and to offer the opportunity to explore candidate genes. Custom SeqCap EZ libraries, NextSeq500 sequencing and a homemade pipeline enable the analysis of 311 dyslipidemia-related genes. In the training group (48 DNA from patients with a well-established molecular diagnosis), this nextgeneration seq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After genomic DNA extraction, DNA from the proband and patient IV.2 was sequenced and analyzed as previously detailed with the DysliSEQ custom design. 10 This panel includes coding exons and intron/exon junctions of 311 genes selected from published literature: (1) genes identified in monogenic dyslipidemia, (2) genes identified in genome-wide association studies in lipid metabolism through direct or indirect effects, (3) genes associated with dyslipidemia in mice, and (4) single-nucleotide polymorphisms already described in familial hypercholesterolemia genetic risk scores and in genome-wide association studies (with P >5.10 -8 ). Among these genes, a first intention panel was defined for FHBL ( APOB, PCSK9, ANGPTL3 ), abetalipoproteinemia ( ABL , OMIM 200100; MTTP ), and chylomicron retention disease ( CMRD , OMIM No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After genomic DNA extraction, DNA from the proband and patient IV.2 was sequenced and analyzed as previously detailed with the DysliSEQ custom design. 10 This panel includes coding exons and intron/exon junctions of 311 genes selected from published literature: (1) genes identified in monogenic dyslipidemia, (2) genes identified in genome-wide association studies in lipid metabolism through direct or indirect effects, (3) genes associated with dyslipidemia in mice, and (4) single-nucleotide polymorphisms already described in familial hypercholesterolemia genetic risk scores and in genome-wide association studies (with P >5.10 -8 ). Among these genes, a first intention panel was defined for FHBL ( APOB, PCSK9, ANGPTL3 ), abetalipoproteinemia ( ABL , OMIM 200100; MTTP ), and chylomicron retention disease ( CMRD , OMIM No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…246700; SAR1B ). In the absence of a variant in the first intention panel, relevant variants were selected as previously described 10 ( Table S1.3 ). The only relevant variant common to the proband and his granddaughter and that cosegregated with the combined hypocholesterolemia observed in the family after Sanger sequencing was the E97G variant in the LIPC gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA from peripheral blood leucocytes was amplified using the Multiplicom ADH MASTR assay v2.0 multiplexing kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or libraries were prepared using Ampliseq, a SeqCapEZ Solution-Based Enrichment strategy (Roche NimbleGen Madison, WI, USA). Sequencing was performed on coding DNA sequences and flanking introns (exon padding +/−30 bp) of the LDLR , PCSK9 , APOB , and APOE genes and SNPs included in the wPRS as described [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coding exons of LRP6 , CYP7A1, and LDLRAP1 and their flanking exon–intron boundaries (100 pb surrounding each exon boundary) were sequenced by Sanger or by next-generation sequencing [ 49 ]. The coverage was >99% for the coding bases of the LRP6 and CYP7A1 genes and 90% for LDLRAP1 , in the 160 unrelated ADH probands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%