1988
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1988)027<0562:doangs>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Nested Grid, Second Moment Turbulence Closure Model and Application to the 1982 ASCOT Brush Creek Data Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This correction to the Lagrangian model is important when the turbulence intensity is highly non-uniform. Ground level time-integrated concentration is calculated at each computational node by summing the contribution from all particles in the domain multiplied by the sampling interval t. The contribution to a location is calculated using a three-dimensional Gaussian kernel (Yamada and Bunker, 1988). For this study, the particles were representing neutral tracers and no decay, deposition or buoyancy effects were considered.…”
Section: Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model (Lpdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction to the Lagrangian model is important when the turbulence intensity is highly non-uniform. Ground level time-integrated concentration is calculated at each computational node by summing the contribution from all particles in the domain multiplied by the sampling interval t. The contribution to a location is calculated using a three-dimensional Gaussian kernel (Yamada and Bunker, 1988). For this study, the particles were representing neutral tracers and no decay, deposition or buoyancy effects were considered.…”
Section: Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model (Lpdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair of models used in this study was developed by Yamada Science and Art Inc. to simulate the turbulent transport of airborne materials based on the work of Yamada (1982) and Yamada and Bunker (1988). The models were tested against (a) nocturnal drainage flow in the California Geysers area (Yamada, 1981) with tree canopy effects (Yamada, 1982); (b) pollutant transport in Brush Creek, Colorado (Yamada and Bunker, 1988); (c) dispersion of airborne materials at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California (Yamada et al, 1992); and (d) tracer gas dispersion in southern Nevada to northwestern Arizona (Yamada, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models were tested against (a) nocturnal drainage flow in the California Geysers area (Yamada, 1981) with tree canopy effects (Yamada, 1982); (b) pollutant transport in Brush Creek, Colorado (Yamada and Bunker, 1988); (c) dispersion of airborne materials at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California (Yamada et al, 1992); and (d) tracer gas dispersion in southern Nevada to northwestern Arizona (Yamada, 2000). The approach provided satisfactory results in these instances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models usually take the topography of the study area into consideration and are able to simulate the L&SB features over an area of several hundred kilometers square at a time (Mahrer and Pielke, 1978;Estoque and Gross, 1981;Kikuchi et al, 1981;Ookouchi and Wakata, 1984;Yamada and Bunker, 1988;Papageorgiou,1988;Kondo,1990;Itoh,1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%