2014
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Natural Practice to Adapt Conservation Goals to Global Change

Abstract: Conservation goals at the start of the 21st century reflect a combination of contrasting ideas. Ideal nature is something that is historically intact but also futuristically flexible. Ideal nature is independent from humans, but also, because of the pervasiveness of human impacts, only able to reach expression through human management. These tensions emerge in current management rationales because scientists and managers are struggling to accommodate old and new scientific and cultural thinking, while also mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land‐use change is commonly defined as a human‐induced process, which produces significant consequences for land and related ecosystems. Human activities tend to modify the natural landscape at different scales and to different extents (Heller & Hobbs, ; Lausch et al, ). Changes in population density and agricultural intensification are the most important driving forces behind land‐use change and the leading factors in regional human‐land relationships (Niedertscheider et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land‐use change is commonly defined as a human‐induced process, which produces significant consequences for land and related ecosystems. Human activities tend to modify the natural landscape at different scales and to different extents (Heller & Hobbs, ; Lausch et al, ). Changes in population density and agricultural intensification are the most important driving forces behind land‐use change and the leading factors in regional human‐land relationships (Niedertscheider et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The axis distinguishing the nature of the tools used (low regrets vs. climate targeted, Table , Fig. ) was designated on practical grounds, and parallels the “Natural Practice” approach whereby Heller and Hobbs () recommend that ecological renovation decisions favor interventions that would be considered less rather than more intrusive. Social science research has indicated that managers and the general public are more willing to implement intervention options that tend to be beneficial regardless of the rate or extent of climate change (Ausden , Hagerman and Satterfield ); often called “low‐regrets” options.…”
Section: A Typology Of Options For Ecological Renovation and Nature Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, conservation has valued the nativeness and naturalness of species and ecosystems extremely highly. For example, Heller and Hobbs () noted that “Nativeness serves as a proxy for naturalness.” The same authors, however, drive home the point that
Management rhetoric seems paradoxically to ask that managers allow for change so that ecosystems can adapt but also that they not permit change so that systems can remain intact.
…”
Section: Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%