2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12024-023-00652-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a multiplex panel with 36 insertion/deletion markers (InDel) for individual identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hematin was table to obtain full recovery up to 21 μM of input at 57 μM there was a drop in recovery to 73%. In comparison to other INDEL panels, the developed panel is not resistant to hematin or humic acid to the same degree [44,45]. Studies using 24plex have at 1 ng, shown higher recovery than the INDEL panel for the same inhibitors [46,47].…”
Section: Challenging Samplesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hematin was table to obtain full recovery up to 21 μM of input at 57 μM there was a drop in recovery to 73%. In comparison to other INDEL panels, the developed panel is not resistant to hematin or humic acid to the same degree [44,45]. Studies using 24plex have at 1 ng, shown higher recovery than the INDEL panel for the same inhibitors [46,47].…”
Section: Challenging Samplesmentioning
confidence: 87%