2018
DOI: 10.1002/fam.2677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a multi‐layered skin simulant for burn injury evaluation of protective fabrics exposed to low radiant heat

Abstract: Summary To simulate temperature rise of human skin and to predict burn injury during radiant heat exposure, the traditional method is to use a sensor to simulate skin surface and use a numerical model to simulate heat transfer in inner skin. However, the numerical models of skin burns are based on few experimental data of nude skin and some simplifications of human skin characteristics. In this study, a new multi‐layered skin simulant is presented for low radiant heat exposures up to 15 kW/m2. The skin simulan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the segmentation of skin and bones, analysis of organ segmentation [ 28 , 29 ] as well as an extraction of possible tumors [ 30 , 31 ] have to be implemented. This thermal model could be based on the Pennes bioheat equation in addition to existing models, such as 2D thermal skin models [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the segmentation of skin and bones, analysis of organ segmentation [ 28 , 29 ] as well as an extraction of possible tumors [ 30 , 31 ] have to be implemented. This thermal model could be based on the Pennes bioheat equation in addition to existing models, such as 2D thermal skin models [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feature that could contribute to overestimation of differences (vs. custom thermistors) when using the skin model is that the same silicone elastomer was used for both the skin model and to encapsulate the custom thermistors ( T sk sensors), based on this material having thermal properties that reasonably approximates human skin [ 32 , 42 ]. The method of production meant that the top surface of the skin model and the bottom surface of the custom thermistor were each flat and smooth, and, in combination with being the same material, the thermal contact resistance may have been disproportionally low for the custom thermistor on the skin model compared to the custom thermistors on the human skin or compared to the Grant thermistors or iButtons on the skin model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thermal skin model (outer dimensions 300 mm × 300 mm × 10 mm) was made using a dark gray silicone elastomer (polydimethylsiloxane; Sylgard 170; Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA). Selected properties of this skin simulant were (reported in more detail by Zhai et al [ 32 ]): thermal conductivity ~0.23 W/(m∙K), thermal diffusivity ~12.8 × 10 −8 m 2 ·s −1 , emissivity ~0.9, and density ~1350 kg·m −3 , which compare quite well with human epidermis: 0.21–0.63 W/(m∙K), 4.9–14.6 × 10 −8 m 2 ·s −1 , 0.96–0.99, and ~1200 kg·m −3 for the same properties, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the model validation was performed with experimental data from living skin which includes the effect of blood and tissue fluid shifts but does not include the effect of active liquid sweating [25]. In a previous study, researchers developed a multilayered dry skin simulant with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to directly measure the temperatures at different skin depths [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%