2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a model for the prediction of feed intake by dairy cows: 1. Prediction of feed intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
59
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of cows used in this study calved during autumn (36% of cows calved in September, October, or November). Therefore, the observed decrease in predicted daily methane emissions during the summer period could also be due to a decrease in feed intake, which commonly occurs at the end of lactation (Zom et al 2012). Predicted daily methane emissions also differed between years (Fig.…”
Section: Prediction Of Methane Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of cows used in this study calved during autumn (36% of cows calved in September, October, or November). Therefore, the observed decrease in predicted daily methane emissions during the summer period could also be due to a decrease in feed intake, which commonly occurs at the end of lactation (Zom et al 2012). Predicted daily methane emissions also differed between years (Fig.…”
Section: Prediction Of Methane Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on 100 lactating parity 1 and 2 cows collected on the Dutch farm Nij Bosma Zathe (Leeuwarden, the Netherlands) between May 2003 and December 2004 (Beerda et al, 2007) were also available. At this farm, differences in milking frequencies (2 or 3 times daily) and feeding strategy (fed a TMR with low-or high-energy content) existed; DM of the diet varied from 48 to 49/100 g. Data on 748 lactating parity 1 to 5 cows were collected on 6 different experimental herds (9 separate experimental sites) between 1991 and 2001 (Zom et al, 2012); average DM of the diets was 54/100 g. Data on a further 705 lactating parity 1 to 5 cows collected on 1 experimental farm between 2003 and 2011 were also available. All these data were collected in 21 different experiments.…”
Section: The Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De lagere melkproductie van koeien met het lipogene rantsoen kan verklaard worden door de lagere drogestof-en energie-inname van het lipogene rantsoen. Oorzaak voor de lagere energie-inname op het lipogene rantsoen was mogelijk het lagere drogestofgehalte van het lipogene rantsoen vergeleken met het glucogene rantsoen (Zom et al, 2012). Om het drogestofgehalte van het lipogene en glucogene vergelijkbaar te maken werd aan het lipogene rantsoen droge bietenperspulp toegevoegd, maar dit verhoogde de drogestof-en energieopname niet tot het niveau van het glucogene rantsoen.…”
Section: Effecten Van Een Lipogeen Of Glucogeen Rantsoen Op Persistenunclassified