Development of a Model for Total Productive Maintenance Barriers to Enhance the Life Cycle of Productive Equipment

Mishra, Rajesh P.; Gupta, Gourav; Sharma, Anita

doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.037

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Applied method Observation Tampubolon and Purba [2] Lean methods Review article Nallusamy and Saravanan [5] SMED applied in automobile industry Changeover time reduced by 18% Mendhe and Rathi [6] SMED applied in steel industry Productivity improved by 15% Moreira et al [7] Lean tools applied in steel industry OEE improved by 4% Rehman et al [9] TPM applied in textile industry Production improved by 9.6% Barot et al [10] Lean methods applied in heat exchange manufacturing industry Productivity improved by 50-70% Mishra et al [11] TPM applied in Indian Manufacturing industry…”

Section: Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These pillars include autonomous maintenance, focused maintenance, planned maintenance, quality maintenance, education and training, safety, health and environment, office TPM and development management [11]. The TPM methodology brings together both production and maintenance with a combination of practice, teamwork, and continuous improvement [24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Implementation of lean manufacturing methods to improve rolling mill productivity

2024

IJATEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, steel producers face challenges in enhancing the efficiency of their rolling mills to boost goods productivity. The productivity of any company significantly influences its profitability. Enhancing equipment availability can lead to increased productivity. By minimizing breakdowns, the availability of equipment can be maximized, thus elevating productivity. Consequently, this study aims to reduce downtime in the rolling mill and improve equipment availability. The primary objective is to enhance the productivity of the rolling mill by implementing lean manufacturing methods, specifically single minute exchange of die (SMED) and total productive maintenance (TPM). Following the implementation of SMED and TPM, the availability and productivity of the rolling mill improved by approximately11.37% and 5%, respectively. Moreover, the average overall equipment efficiency (OEE) witnessed a significant improvement of about 30.30%, rising from 56.42% to 73.52%. This enhanced OEE can be attributed to the reduction in section changeover time and a decrease in breakdowns.

show abstract

Section: Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of lean manufacturing methods to improve rolling mill productivity

2024

IJATEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous manufacturing companies attempted TPM in the past, but they failed because of an insufficient understanding of the obstacles to its effective implementation [28]. The literature has long provided many works on worldwide TPM implementation barriers; [22,28,42,49,57,65,71,73,75,76] are the most recent and accurate research works analyzing the barriers to TPM implementation across manufacturing companies. These works emphasized and detailed the following ten critical barriers to TPM, which were ranked in order of criticality in [75] as follows: (1) lack of top management commitment and support; (2) lack of training and education; (3) lack of motivation; (4) employee resistance;…”

Section: Barriers To Tpmmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The literature categorizes these barriers into numerous families, such as cultural, organizational, behavioral, technological, financial, departmental, and operational barriers [42,78]. However, this categorization or understanding is reductionist (i.e., pragmatic in that it comes from analytical thinking that reduces the organization into its functions or departments), uncertain, and ineffective in overcoming TPM's implementation barriers since it is confusing for companies.…”

Section: Barriers To Tpmmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Sustainable Total Productive Maintenance (STPM)

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable Total Productive Maintenance (STPM) arose in 2021 as a promising, new concept to fill the lack of sustainability in Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and allow companies to overcome its implementation barriers. It revolves around increasing the understanding of the systems approach and contributing to setting contemporary companies’ sustainable ideology by supporting orientation toward sustainability from a sustainable maintenance perspective. However, STPM is still in its infancy and is viewed as a complement to the traditional TPM approach and is based on its pillars. Moreover, there is still a dearth of literature discussing STPM. This study aims to present STPM as a novel substitute for TPM while building its unique mechanism based on re-engineered fourth generation management (R4thGM). To pursue such a goal, 94 papers from Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases published in 2008–2023 were reviewed. This study’s novelty comes from presenting STPM as the best-suited lean manufacturing and sustainability strategy for enhancing sustainable maintenance, encouraging contemporary maintenance (i.e., Industry 4.0 technology-based sustainable maintenance), and supporting second-era contemporary companies’ orientation toward sustainability. Furthermore, based on recent studies, propositions are formulated to achieve STPM. Finally, research implications and future directions are presented.

show abstract

“…The organization's primary goal is to improve efficiency, lifecycle, and productivity by maintaining better delivery times so that customer satisfaction can be guaranteed. One way to achieve this goal is to implement the concept of Total Productive Maintenance [5].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) on the chicken bowl printing machine by using the theory of change perspective

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses how to improve the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) of the chicken bowl printing machine. OEE is important to measure machine performance in the production process. OEE will affect the costs incurred during production activities, such as product defects, how effective the performance of machines is, and how much time is available for production. The failure-tags analysis was used to identify the category factors causing engine failure. The why-why analysis was used to identify the root cause of the problem, and the theory of change was used to explain what should be implemented by the company to improve the OEE value. In 2020, only December had a value above standard by 95%, based on the Seiichi Nakajima OEE has a good value if the value >85%. The OEE values From January to May were fell from 73% to 34% and then kept increasing to 73% in November. The increase of the OEE value can be achieved by implementing a communication schedule, monitoring and evaluating the performance of maintenance staff to achieve a fast maintenance machine process, and applying maintenance rules and guidelines.

show abstract

Development of a Model for Total Productive Maintenance Barriers to Enhance the Life Cycle of Productive Equipment

Cited by 11 publications

References 10 publications

Implementation of lean manufacturing methods to improve rolling mill productivity

Implementation of lean manufacturing methods to improve rolling mill productivity

A Review of Sustainable Total Productive Maintenance (STPM)

Improving the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) on the chicken bowl printing machine by using the theory of change perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About