2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00145-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a measure to assess quality management in certified firms

Abstract: The theory of quality management has been studied from different areas: quality leaders' ideas, empirical research and formal evaluation models. This has helped identify a set of critical factors for a successful implementation, as a way to improve customer satisfaction and performance.Our study reviews the literature from these three points of view, in order to identify measures for change towards a quality culture, which can be empirically tested from the answers provided by those responsible for quality in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
23

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
110
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Process Management. We design processes in our firm to be "mistake-proof " to minimize the changes of errors [24,37,42,61,62,65,67,68,70].…”
Section: A12 Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process Management. We design processes in our firm to be "mistake-proof " to minimize the changes of errors [24,37,42,61,62,65,67,68,70].…”
Section: A12 Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item 8 was deleted. After assessing reliability, detailed item analysis was carried out by adopting Nunnally's (1978) method for proper assignment of items to each factor, which is consistent with the literature (Conca, Llopis & Tari, 2004;Grandzol & Gershon, 1998;Wee & Quazi, 2005). Item 6 had an almost constant correlation index across the management commitment and empowerment construct, thus item 6 was eliminated from the item analysis.…”
Section: Reliability Assessment and Item Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers conducted research in this direction (Saraph, Benson, & Schroeder, 1989;Conca, Llopis, & Tarí, 2004; among others). After this compilation of studies, it is clear that the TQM principles considered are different among different researchers, and vary in number.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%