Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection

Influence of the maintenance management with a comprehensive approach on the efficient and rational operation of vehicle fleets

“…Mnogi autori navode da je za efikasno upravljanje održava-njem neophodno usklađeno posmatrati proces održa-vanja i primarni proces u kompaniji [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Pored toga, autori ističu da postoji značajan uticaj procesa održavanja na primarni proces u kompaniji [8,9,10,11].…”

“…Prema autorima rada [11], merenje produktivnosti procesa održavanja predstavlja važnu funkciju za postizanje održivog funkcionisanja sistema održavanja. U tom smislu, neophodno je precizno definisati sistem za merenje produktivnosti procesa održavanja, kao i odgovarajuće pokazatelje procesa održavanja [4]. U radu [2] navodi se da u okviru aktivnosti upravljanja na strateškom nivou prioriteti primarnog procesa u kompaniji postaju prioriteti procesa održavanja.…”

Data quality assessment of maintenance reporting procedures

“…Critical Component Identification (Dehghania et al, 2012) (Cavalcante et al , 2007) Measuring/Assessment Efficiency (Wang et al, 2010) (Muchiri et al, 2011;Vujanovićet al, 2012;Van & Pintelon, 2014) Sun (2004); Peck et al (1998);Ozbek et al (2010a,b); Hjalmarsson et al (1996); Liu & Yu (2004); Rouse et al (2002);Fallah-Fini et al (2015); Jeon et al (2011);Roll et al (1989); Charnes et al (1984) (de un Caso, 2008) (e Costa et al, 2012) Maintenance Action Selection (Kumar & Maiti, 2012) (Alarcón et al, 2007;Thor et al, 2013) Tan et al (2011);Fouladgar et al (2012) developed MCDM-based maintenance policy selection frameworks taking into account maintenance cost, addedvalue and safety dimensions. Shahin et al (2012) rather focused on the selection of appropriate (optimum) maintenance strategies, paying special attention to reliability, availability and maintainability criteria and potential interdependencies (via ANP).…”

“…The only paper that integrates a data quality criterion is ( Van & Pintelon, 2014), where the authors measure the "accuracy" of maintenance report records. Given the fact that existing expert maintenance systems fail, or have no specific interest, to take into account various data quality dimensions, as well as in providing experts with the possibility to specify -in real-time -their own preferences regarding each of these dimensions, our research aims to fulfill this gap by adapting existing data quality frameworks to the maintenance sector (the next section discussing such frameworks).…”

“…The analysis outcome, regarding each MM level, is given in the form of tabular in Table 5, which highlight that data quality is hardly considered in the reviewed papers knowing that "Quality" refers, in most of the reviewed papers, to other quality aspects than Data Quality, except in ( Van & Pintelon, 2014).…”