2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz422.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a liver cancer risk prediction model for the general population in china: A potential tool for screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While early clinical trial results show promising outcomes 11 and large-scale trials are currently conducted 12 , risk adjusted targeting of the most susceptible individuals could further increase efficiency and enable broader implementation across age groups. Many bespoke risk models have been developed for specific cancer types including Colorectal [13][14][15] , Melanoma [16][17][18] , Lung 19-21 Prostate [22][23][24] , Breast [25][26][27][28] , Pancreatic 29,30 , Liver [31][32][33] , Stomach 34,35 , Kidney cancer 36 or AML 37 . The emergence of multi-cancer early detection tests warrant the development of pan-cancer risk models, which have recently been developed building on polygenic risk scores 38 or primary care data 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early clinical trial results show promising outcomes 11 and large-scale trials are currently conducted 12 , risk adjusted targeting of the most susceptible individuals could further increase efficiency and enable broader implementation across age groups. Many bespoke risk models have been developed for specific cancer types including Colorectal [13][14][15] , Melanoma [16][17][18] , Lung 19-21 Prostate [22][23][24] , Breast [25][26][27][28] , Pancreatic 29,30 , Liver [31][32][33] , Stomach 34,35 , Kidney cancer 36 or AML 37 . The emergence of multi-cancer early detection tests warrant the development of pan-cancer risk models, which have recently been developed building on polygenic risk scores 38 or primary care data 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%