2023
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2022.3217890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Ka-Band Non-Regular Multibeam Coverage Antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) Reconfigurable RF front-ends can add flexibility in redistributing power and bandwidth according to a predefined beam-hopping allocation scheme [13] or even to the real-time users' distribution over the geographical region of interest, thus minimizing the difference between the required and offered capacity values [14]. To equalize at best the required and offered capacities, nonregular coverage can also be implemented by tailoring the beam contours on the basis of the users' distribution in the coverage area [15]. All the aforementioned technical solutions ask for Multi-Beam Antennas (MBAs) and corresponding RF front-ends, which can generate a number of simultaneous independent beams.…”
Section: Current Trends In Rf Front-ends For Communication Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4) Reconfigurable RF front-ends can add flexibility in redistributing power and bandwidth according to a predefined beam-hopping allocation scheme [13] or even to the real-time users' distribution over the geographical region of interest, thus minimizing the difference between the required and offered capacity values [14]. To equalize at best the required and offered capacities, nonregular coverage can also be implemented by tailoring the beam contours on the basis of the users' distribution in the coverage area [15]. All the aforementioned technical solutions ask for Multi-Beam Antennas (MBAs) and corresponding RF front-ends, which can generate a number of simultaneous independent beams.…”
Section: Current Trends In Rf Front-ends For Communication Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given mission scenario, the specific advantages and disadvantages of the MBA solutions with the associated frontends have to be carefully traded-off in terms of performances (e.g., directivity, C/I, system capacity), power requirements, hardware complexity, reliability, redundancy, reconfigurability, accommodation (i.e., mass, envelope, number and size of reflectors), and costs. The comparison among different MBAs for some relevant mission scenarios are reported in [9], [14], [15]. As an example, Viasat-3, a global system comprising three GEO satellites and expected to be launched early 2023, is anticipated to deliver at least 1 Tbps per satellite, each with a coverage having more than 2000 beams (Fig.…”
Section: Current Trends In Rf Front-ends For Communication Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, for low and medium orbit satellites, the scanning requirements can reach ±60 • [5]. Array antennas are a widely used solution due to their high gain and scanning agility [6], [7]. However, as the wavelength shortens, the feeding networks of these antennas become complex, lossy, and expensive [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%