2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Japanese version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) based on Item Response Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
183
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
183
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A score of ≥ 11 may indicate excessive daytime sleepiness. The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ESS that we used have been confirmed [14].…”
Section: Sleepiness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A score of ≥ 11 may indicate excessive daytime sleepiness. The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ESS that we used have been confirmed [14].…”
Section: Sleepiness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The sleepiness of shift workers and day workers at work was measured using the Japanese version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [14], which consists of eight items rated on a scale from 0 to 3, yielding total scores between 0 and 24. A score of ≥ 11 may indicate excessive daytime sleepiness.…”
Section: Sleepiness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the validated Japanese version that was described in a previous report (Takegami et al 2009). The third limitation is the application of many different tests with the same P-value threshold in our study (i.e., the multiple comparisons problem).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical severities of iRLS patients were assessed with the IRLSS Group rating scale for RLS symptoms, the Japanese version of the ESS (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) (Takegami et al, 2009) for daytime sleepiness, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Doi et al, 2000) for subjective sleep quality. In the current study, the IRLSS scores varied from 9 to 36, indicating that RLS symptoms ranged from mild to severe.…”
Section: Clinical Assessments and Drug Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%