“…Based on the microfluidic design proposed in a landmark paper from 2003 (Taylor et al., 2003), several examples of how neuronal cell cultures can be grown, manipulated, and studied in microfluidic devices have been provided in the last 15 years, with a number of device options commercially available for neuroscientists to study axonal growth and connectivity, such as Merck's AXIS™ Axon Isolation Devices, Ananda's™ Neuro Devices, Ufluidic's Axon chips, eNUVIO OMEGA4 Neuronal Co‐Culture chips and Xona Microfluidics ® XonaChips (summarized in Table 1) . Various modifications of the device layout and the development of new methodologies based on the device topology have since been reported, expanding the breath of applications that miniaturized technologies can provide in neuroscience research, such as axonal response to injury (Taylor et al., 2005), myelination (Park et al., 2009), synaptic formation and function (Shi et al., 2013), probing the direct and indirect response of neuronal cultures to chemical stimuli (Robertson et al., 2014), neurite growth (Frimat et al., 2010) (Nagendran et al., 2018), proof‐of‐concept pharmacology (MacKerron et al., 2017), and drug screening (Fantuzzo et al., 2020). Microfluidic topologies have also shown the capability to promote the asymmetric spatial organization of dendritic and axonal subcellular components, leading to the formation of unidirectional connections where axons from one culture are free to grow in a permissive direction, but extension from a neighboring culture is impeded, thus forming asymmetric connections (Holloway et al., 2019).…”