2020
DOI: 10.1177/1367493520943772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a high-risk neonatal infection control competency scale

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to measure high-risk neonatal infection control competency among nurses in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The study participants included 251 nurses working in NICUs at seven hospitals in South Korea. The scale was designed to measure high-risk neonatal infection control competency in terms of performance (HirNICCS_P) and knowledge (HirNICCS_K), which were addressed by 42 and 54 items, respectively, and was initially subjected to content validity testing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
5
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size for the study was calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 [ 22 ]. Considering that the effect size was 0.40-0.72 in previous studies, which is similar to that in this study [ 23 - 25 ], a moderate effect size (f) of 0.50, a significance level (α) of .05, and a statistical power (1 – β) of .90 were used, with a suitable sample size (2-tailed test) of 44. Considering a dropout rate of 10%, a total of 50 participants were recruited for the final study population, with 25 (50%) participants each in the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The sample size for the study was calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 [ 22 ]. Considering that the effect size was 0.40-0.72 in previous studies, which is similar to that in this study [ 23 - 25 ], a moderate effect size (f) of 0.50, a significance level (α) of .05, and a statistical power (1 – β) of .90 were used, with a suitable sample size (2-tailed test) of 44. Considering a dropout rate of 10%, a total of 50 participants were recruited for the final study population, with 25 (50%) participants each in the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The total possible score was 28 points, including 10 points for basic care, 8 points for feeding management and 10 points for skin care and environmental management; the higher the total score, the higher the knowledge level. The reliability for the overall scale was KR-20 ¼ .67 in a previous study [30] and .61 in this study.…”
Section: Hirnic Knowledgesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Student knowledge regarding HirNIC was assessed using the High-Risk Neonatal Infection Control Competency Scale Knowledge (HirNICCS_K) developed by Yu et al [30]. The HirNICCS_K consists of five subdomains: basic care, skin care, feeding management, medication and invasive procedure management, and environmental management.…”
Section: Hirnic Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate nurses' neonatal infection control performance, the High‐Risk Neonatal Infection Control Competency Scale_Performance (HirNICCS_P) developed by Yu et al (2020) was used. The HirNICCS_P comprises five sub‐factors with 42 items: basic care, skincare, feeding management, medication and invasive procedure management, and environmental management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%