2016
DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.10.0106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a High‐Density Linkage Map and Tagging Leaf Spot Resistance in Pearl Millet Using Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing Markers

Abstract: Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br; also Cenchrus americanus (L.) Morrone] is an important crop throughout the world but better genomic resources for this species are needed to facilitate crop improvement. Genome mapping studies are a prerequisite for tagging agronomically important traits. Genotyping-bysequencing (GBS) markers can be used to build high-density linkage maps, even in species lacking a reference genome. A recombinant inbred line (RIL) mapping population was developed from a cross betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Broad‐sense heritability ( H 2 ) was estimated for each trait using the procedure of Punnuri et al (). H 2 was defined as: H2=MSgen(MSgen+MSrep+MSer)1 where MSgen is the genotype mean square, MSrep is the replication mean square, and MSer is the error mean square from the two‐way ANOVA .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broad‐sense heritability ( H 2 ) was estimated for each trait using the procedure of Punnuri et al (). H 2 was defined as: H2=MSgen(MSgen+MSrep+MSer)1 where MSgen is the genotype mean square, MSrep is the replication mean square, and MSer is the error mean square from the two‐way ANOVA .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broad-sense heritability (H 2 ) was estimated for each trait using the procedure of Punnuri et al (2016). H 2 was defined as:…”
Section: Seed Trait Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of a tetraploid genome, such as that of P. virgatum, may be more informative than the use of diploid genomes, considering our tetraploid mapping population, as there is a greater possibility of similar chromosomal rearrangements between these species (Daverdin et al, 2015). It is common to find a smaller number of SNPs in linkage maps of forage grass species without an assembled genome, as observed for common millet (Panicum miliaceum) (Rajput et al, 2016) and signalgrass (Urochloa decumbens) (Ferreira et al, 2019), than in those of species with a reference genome, such as foxtail millet (Setaria italica) (Jia et al, 2017) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (Punnuri et al, 2016). Another alternative is the use of "pseudogenomes" assembled from GBS tags to include unique alleles of a species, as in Paspalum vaginatum, but the number of markers remained relatively small (Qi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Linkage Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies involving the QTL mapping of other minor and pseudo-cereals, however, are relatively limited and mostly include studies in rye (Erath et al 2016, Miedaner et al 2018, Myśków et al 2018, Wang et al 2015, oat (Admassu-Yimer et al 2019, Babiker et al 2015, Pellizzaro et al 2016, Schneider et al 2015, Sunstrum et al 2018, Zimmer et al 2018, and millet. Of the various types of millet, pearl millet (Ambawat et al 2016, Aparna et al 2015, Kumar et al 2016b, 2018, Pucher et al 2018, Punnuri et al 2016, Taunk et al 2018 and foxtail millet (Fang et al 2016, Mauro-Herrera and Doust 2016, Ni et al 2017, Odonkor et al 2018, Wang et al 2017a, 2017b have received the majority of research attention, although one study also focused on proso millet (Rajput et al 2016). Notably, very few QTL mapping studies have focused on pseudocereals.…”
Section: Biparental Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%