2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol

Abstract: Reporting guidelines are intended to enhance the clarity and transparency of research publications. Concept mapping, a mixed-methods design, has been widely used in health research. Current reporting guidelines for mixed-methods studies are not relevant for concept mapping research. The aim of this study is to develop a reporting guideline for concept mapping research following the EQUATOR network toolkit. Guideline development is in three stages: 1. A systematic review to identify key components of reporting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is listed with the EQUATOR network as a guideline under development (https://www.equator-network.org, accessed on 1 July 2023). Additionally, we published a study protocol for developing concept mapping reporting guidelines, including the details of the systematic review methodology we intended to follow [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study is listed with the EQUATOR network as a guideline under development (https://www.equator-network.org, accessed on 1 July 2023). Additionally, we published a study protocol for developing concept mapping reporting guidelines, including the details of the systematic review methodology we intended to follow [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data extraction tool was developed based on the detailed description of concept mapping provided by Trochim [1,[4][5][6]. One researcher (SP) completed data extraction against our 46-item data extraction spreadsheet [27]. All data items were coded 'Reported', 'Not Reported', or 'Not applicable'.…”
Section: Data Collection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convenient purposive sampling was used to recruit parent participants until no new statements were generated during the brainstorming phase. Details added to Methods section: there is no specific number of participants recommended for a CM study [26]. Kane and Trochim [27] suggest that least 5 participants can produce meaningful data.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%