“…The method had high detection rates of 96.98%, 94.29%, 98.65%, and 95.32% on the FERET, Aberdeen, IMM, and CVL databases, respectively, and robustness to different poses, light conditions, and glasses. Phromsuthirak and Umchid [15] first adopted the EyeMap algorithm to locate possible eye regions, and then the correct eye regions were determined using the proposed geometrical test methods. The evaluation results showed a detection rate of 92.3% for frontal facial images and 85.7% for rotational facial images.…”