2021
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a general‐purpose parallel finite element method for analyzing earthquake engineering problems

Abstract: A parallel finite element method (FEM) based on high-fidelity models for solving diverse earthquake engineering problems is presented. Its key feature is a parallel solver that is tuned to solve large-scale wave equations. Tensorial material constitutive relations of concrete and soil and sophisticated nonlinear joint elements are implemented to broaden the applicability of the parallel FEM. The performance of the proposed parallel FEM is demonstrated for three examples; namely, seismic response, liquefaction,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We implemented a rigorous joint element for modeling the slip behavior of faults and a symplectic time integration method with a Hamiltonian formulation using the opensource FEM software FrontISTR [16] to develop a numerical tool for fault displacement simulation [17].…”
Section: Fem For the Fault Displacement Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a rigorous joint element for modeling the slip behavior of faults and a symplectic time integration method with a Hamiltonian formulation using the opensource FEM software FrontISTR [16] to develop a numerical tool for fault displacement simulation [17].…”
Section: Fem For the Fault Displacement Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DDDM solver outperforms a successive symmetric overrelaxation (SSOR) preconditioned solver, which we assume is a standard solver, as will be discussed in Section 6.3. Also, in an article [27], an elastic seismic response analysis of an NPP building installed on the ground consisting of one million DOFs with hexahedral and plate elements involving 2700 steps for 54 seconds took 1.1 hours using the DDDM solver. In contrast, the SSOR solver took 13.8 hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%