2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a GC/C/IRMS method – Confirmation of a novel steroid profiling approach in doping control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that it was also one of the 5α‐metabolites, namely 5αAdiol, that was the best target compound for T gel detection by IRMS. This is in agreement with other studies investigating detectability of T gel by IRMS in healthy individuals, where primarily 5αAdiol and then T were shown to be the most sensitive target compounds (TC) . In contrast, we have shown that when administrating T through injection 5βAdiol as well as T were the best TCs for IRMS analysis …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results show that it was also one of the 5α‐metabolites, namely 5αAdiol, that was the best target compound for T gel detection by IRMS. This is in agreement with other studies investigating detectability of T gel by IRMS in healthy individuals, where primarily 5αAdiol and then T were shown to be the most sensitive target compounds (TC) . In contrast, we have shown that when administrating T through injection 5βAdiol as well as T were the best TCs for IRMS analysis …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…An aliquot of each urine sample was prepared to check the steroid profile according to routine sample preparation procedures (Van Eenoo et al ., ; De Brabanter et al ., ). The concentrations of the target compounds allowed us to calculate the necessary sample volume using the formula presented in previous work (Van Renterghem et al ., in press). This calculation was based upon a minimum final extract volume of 25 μL and a required extract concentration of 50 µg/mL, assuming 100% extraction recovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[26] Correction for acetate adducts The GC conditions were exactly the same as those described for full-scan GC-MS analysis.…”
Section: Gc-c-irmsmentioning
confidence: 99%